The hottest Regime Change Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2728 implied HN points • 09 Dec 24
  1. The US has played a major role in influencing events in Syria. It's important to recognize that outside powers can shape conflicts and outcomes.
  2. People often have their own reasons for fighting in conflicts, but that doesn't mean outside influences are absent. The US and its allies were heavily involved in Syria's struggles.
  3. Understanding global conflict requires acknowledging the US's powerful role as an empire. This knowledge helps explain why certain countries become targets for regime change.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2686 implied HN points • 08 Dec 24
  1. The Syrian government led by Assad is being replaced, likely by groups supported by the U.S. This shows a shift in power dynamics in the region.
  2. Al-Qaeda has been rebranded as a more 'woke' group, with media portraying them in a softer light despite their violent past. This reflects a significant change in how such groups are viewed.
  3. The ongoing U.S. efforts in the area involve a long game strategy, suggesting that while current actions may not yield immediate results, they are part of a larger plan for eventual dominance.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2039 implied HN points • 12 Dec 24
  1. Israel has been heavily involved in Syria, claiming it won't interfere while bombing the country and occupying parts of it. This seems contradictory and raises eyebrows.
  2. Syria is now opening up its economy, which could lead to outside influences taking advantage of its situation. This is often called disaster capitalism.
  3. There's a lot of anger towards wealthy elites as economic inequality rises. This could lead to serious social unrest if people feel they have no other options for change.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1769 implied HN points • 10 Dec 24
  1. The West often views military actions differently based on who is doing them. For example, invading a country for security reasons is seen as wrong for Russia but accepted when done by Israel.
  2. The label 'terrorist organization' is often used by Western powers to justify their actions and military interventions, and it's seen as a tool to control the narrative rather than a factual designation.
  3. The world is becoming unpredictable, and many believe that anything can happen. This means there is hope for positive change, as circumstances can rapidly transform in unexpected ways.
Who is Robert Malone • 30 implied HN points • 08 Feb 25
  1. The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) claims to fight corruption globally but is heavily funded by the US government, which raises questions about its true motives.
  2. OCCRP focuses on investigating foreign governments deemed hostile to US interests and now appears to influence political situations in allied countries as well, like India.
  3. There are concerns that OCCRP and similar organizations act as tools for the US government, potentially pushing for regime change and affecting the reputation of nations without them realizing it.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Nonzero Newsletter • 304 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
  1. The U.S. is returning to a nation-building approach in the Middle East, especially after the recent conflict involving Israel and Hamas. They seem more focused on changing regimes and rebuilding countries than in the past.
  2. Policymakers now view Israel’s actions as an opportunity to reshape the political landscape in the Middle East, similar to the mindset seen during the early 2000s. This brings back memories of previous military interventions.
  3. Rhetoric around recent events has intensified, framing them similarly to significant past tragedies. Leaders are using strong comparisons, which fuels a renewed push for military and political actions in the region.
Thinking about... • 552 implied HN points • 20 Dec 24
  1. The government may be shifting from traditional administration to a new kind of regime led by influential figures like Musk and Trump. This change means that financial power could have more influence than elected positions.
  2. Public health is a significant issue in the U.S., and a lack of a national health system leads to greater health problems among citizens. This situation can result in more anxiety and shorter lives for many people.
  3. With debates over vaccination and health policies, there is a real concern that society could face outbreaks of preventable diseases like mumps and measles due to weakened health protections.
Peter Navarro's Taking Back Trump's America • 923 implied HN points • 24 Jan 24
  1. Issues related to Communist China's economic aggression and military rise are crucial in national policy debate.
  2. Investigation into the 2020 election is essential to maintain election system integrity.
  3. Recognition of medical and political dangers related to COVID-19 vaccines and authoritarian measures is vital.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1965 implied HN points • 16 Jan 24
  1. The 'Rules-Based International Order' enabled violence and conflict in various regions like Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine.
  2. This order allowed for deceptive military actions, regime changes, and destabilization in countries like Syria, Libya, and Iraq.
  3. The 'Rules-Based International Order' led to the suppression of journalism, civilian casualties, and the dominance of powerful interests over ordinary people.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 697 implied HN points • 10 May 23
  1. Mexico's President AMLO criticized US 'interventionism' and funding opposition groups, feeding tension between the two countries.
  2. CIA-associated organizations like USAID have a history of supporting right-wing opposition groups in various countries to challenge governments that challenge US foreign policy interests.
  3. AMLO advocates for cooperation and friendship in US-Mexico relations, opposing far-right US politicians who push for military intervention in Mexico over issues like drug trafficking.
The Upheaval • 1032 implied HN points • 05 Sep 23
  1. Historian Neil Howe predicts a significant shift in America's society and governance, likening it to previous generational historical cycles.
  2. Howe's model suggests a coming crisis leading to the birth of a new national order, potentially involving revolutionary regime change and great societal transformation.
  3. The book presents an optimistic outlook for America's future after the impending crisis, envisioning a new golden age albeit with concerns about potential outcomes and implications.
The Corbett Report • 19 implied HN points • 15 Dec 24
  1. Syria's recent conflict ended with a sudden takeover by rebel groups, which many believe were backed by foreign powers. This shift raises questions about how such a big change happened so quickly after years of fighting.
  2. The new leadership in Syria, primarily led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, is viewed suspiciously as they have ties to past terrorist groups. This raises concerns about their true intentions and how they will govern the country.
  3. The situation in Syria is complex, involving multiple countries and interests. It's not just a local conflict, but a part of a larger struggle that could have implications far beyond Syria's borders.
Diane Francis • 619 implied HN points • 10 Apr 23
  1. Putin's rule in Russia is marked by extreme paranoia and violence, with rival factions forming amid fears of losing power. Assassination and other brutal tactics are used to silence opposition.
  2. A variety of illegal armed groups are emerging, each with their own goals, some wanting to overthrow Putin and others preparing for chaos after his rule. This shows a deep divide among the elite and a potential shift in power.
  3. Political dynamics in Russia are changing, with increasing challenges to Putin's authority. Historical patterns suggest that if he loses a war or power, he could be replaced through backdoor negotiations or even force.
Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey • 880 implied HN points • 01 May 23
  1. America's first black president left a legacy of slavery in Africa due to regime change in Libya.
  2. Obama's war power hypocrisy was evident in his actions in Libya, contrary to his earlier stance on military attacks.
  3. The intervention in Libya was based on false pretenses, such as claims of an imminent genocide in Benghazi, and served various ulterior motives.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 65 implied HN points • 10 Dec 24
  1. The recent change in Syria's leadership has sparked a debate about whether it is a victory for the people or leads to greater suffering. It highlights how different perspectives can shape views on political events.
  2. The U.S. and its allies have been involved in Syria's conflict, allegedly using covert operations to support rebel groups against the Assad regime. This involvement points to a complex web of interests in the region.
  3. The aftermath of the regime change raises concerns about what comes next for Syria. There is a fear that replacing one authoritarian regime with another could lead to a destabilized state similar to Libya.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 338 implied HN points • 10 Nov 22
  1. France's President Macron, US's John Kerry, and Portugal's PM met with Venezuela's President Maduro to discuss lowering oil prices, despite past coup attempts.
  2. The West, including the US, France, and Portugal, is seeking alternatives to Russian oil as the EU faces a deadline to cut off imports and cope with high energy costs.
  3. Western powers, after years of trying to overthrow Venezuela's government, are now engaging in friendly dialogue with President Maduro due to economic interests and the need to reduce oil prices.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 11 implied HN points • 07 Dec 24
  1. It might not now or in coming mom or by now, not if it criminy worn on firing dow how if it might hight if it rock if it might on going on by go to go in or by go or go in or of go of doom or of yow or not, not on go, not if it might go, or might how on down for on cry for going not go now, go or of go to go to go not or by in to not or by go, yow, to going to rock on to go on or by to know, if
  2. Right now, it kind of thriving, with big hitting going on by now, going on might to worn by high on go or, do go or yow, how might high or do not, do  or go on going or of going on by, on rock or might go on or in with now, how to do, or to on, on now, or how to go down in now
  3. Right now, kind of to now, yow, to to rock on, to  comin' in to off it going on on or by rock on or not to in on to by to it now, to of not, on going to from going to go, or might go, to of going on to by know, high on to doin' or might on down, might to it
Geopolitical Economy Report • 358 implied HN points • 25 Jun 22
  1. The US government's Helsinki Commission held a Congressional briefing to discuss breaking up Russia in the name of decolonization.
  2. Participants at the briefing proposed supporting separatist movements within Russia and advocated for the independence of regions like Chechnya, Tatarstan, Dagestan, and Circassia.
  3. The briefing reflects a trend of using left-wing rhetoric to advance imperial interests by the US government, similar to other instances where progressive themes have been co-opted for political motives.
Gray Mirror • 89 implied HN points • 12 Mar 24
  1. The article discusses the importance of understanding historical events beyond myths and legends, pointing out the need to delve deeper into actual history to gain a more accurate perspective.
  2. It emphasizes the significance of moving beyond ideological narratives and recognizing the complexities of past revolutions and political structures to learn valuable lessons.
  3. There's a call for a deeper understanding of the nuances in historical events to avoid getting caught up in superficial or false representations of the past and to make informed decisions for the future.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 299 implied HN points • 04 Apr 22
  1. Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan is facing a foreign-backed regime-change attempt due to his opposition to US foreign policy and his effort to strengthen Pakistan's relations with China and Russia.
  2. Khan's vocal support for Palestinian liberation and his anti-colonial voice on the international stage have made him a target for hostile global elites.
  3. The regime-change efforts in Pakistan reflect a geopolitical power play involving Western interests seeking to assert control and discipline Pakistan amidst its growing alliances with China and Russia.
Fisted by Foucault • 250 implied HN points • 28 Feb 23
  1. The series delves into regime change and color revolutions, emphasizing the importance of understanding the subject thoroughly.
  2. Samantha Power's visit to Budapest focused on initiatives like supporting independent media, addressing corruption, and promoting civic engagement.
  3. Samantha Power is portrayed as a powerful advocate of humanitarian intervention, believing in spreading liberalism globally, even through force.