The hottest Government funding Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Singal-Minded 2246 implied HN points 17 Feb 25
  1. Cutting funding to programs like USAID can lead to serious harm, like people getting sick or even dying. This shows that spending decisions need to be thought out carefully.
  2. It's important for people in power to understand what their cuts will affect, especially for vulnerable groups relying on aid. Making big changes without warning causes unnecessary suffering.
  3. Making cuts for cost savings can backfire and end up costing more in the long run. Leaders should focus on thoughtful policy instead of quick-fix solutions that create more problems.
New Things Under the Sun 96 implied HN points 19 Feb 25
  1. The US government spent about $160 billion on research and development (R&D) in 2022, but this is a declining share of overall GDP. In contrast, the private sector spends significantly more on R&D.
  2. Averaging across sectors, every dollar spent on R&D can generate about $5.50 in economic growth, with some estimates suggesting even higher benefits when considering broader impacts.
  3. Government funding is important because it explores research areas that might be overlooked by private companies, ensuring that valuable scientific knowledge is developed for public benefit.
TK News by Matt Taibbi 23995 implied HN points 12 Feb 25
  1. The government should not control media or information. Instead of helping people decide what is true, it can weaken public trust in journalism.
  2. Censorship laws in other countries are becoming stricter, and many American citizens are currently facing repercussions for their speech abroad.
  3. Taxpayer money is being used to promote propaganda instead of real journalism, which can distort the truth and undermine democracy.
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts 118 implied HN points 01 Mar 25
  1. The media often overlooks the larger issues in biomedical policy and fails to connect the dots in their reporting. They focus too much on individual actions instead of discussing significant systemic problems.
  2. There is a need for reform in the current biomedical system, particularly regarding how funding and resources are allocated. Many aspects of this system are outdated and not effectively serving public health needs.
  3. It's important to have honest discussions about proposed changes in biomedical policies, rather than framing them as attacks on science. Constructive debate can lead to better solutions and improvements in healthcare.
Bailiwick News 1783 implied HN points 09 Oct 24
  1. From 1911 to 1943, U.S. Congress didn't create laws to establish clear definitions or standards for biological products, like vaccines and toxins. This meant there were no guidelines for safety or labeling requirements.
  2. The 1902 Virus-Toxin Act only focused on the licensing of manufacturers, not the products themselves. This led to a lack of oversight on what was in those products and whether they were safe to use.
  3. Even with new regulations in later years, there was still confusion and gaps in laws about the safety and efficacy of biological products, allowing manufacturers to operate without strict requirements.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
TK News by Matt Taibbi 9902 implied HN points 18 Dec 24
  1. The Global Engagement Center (GEC) may not be shut down and could receive a one-year extension. This was part of a deal between Senate Democrats and Republicans.
  2. The GEC has been criticized for funding efforts that involved blacklisting conservative media. This issue continues to raise concerns about free speech.
  3. If the Republican party gives up on standing up for free speech, it could lead to serious consequences for voters. It's important to monitor how this situation develops.
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts 150 implied HN points 23 Feb 25
  1. Universities didn't hold important debates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Topics like school closures and mask mandates were never discussed, leading to a loss of trust from the public.
  2. There's a call for universities to address issues around NIH funding reform. Instead of promoting fear about funding cuts, they should engage in constructive discussions to improve the system.
  3. The general public feels disconnected from universities, especially regarding how taxpayer money is spent. Universities need to listen to these concerns and actively involve diverse opinions to regain public support.
steigan.no 8 implied HN points 01 Mar 25
  1. The relationship between NATO allies is currently in crisis, caused by conflicts involving leaders like Trump and Zelensky. The situation suggests a breakdown in what was once a united West.
  2. There are discussions about the potential for a ban on COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S., with concerns growing about their safety and effectiveness as new evidence emerges.
  3. Greece is experiencing unprecedented strikes and protests in response to political corruption and a tragic train accident, reflecting a deep public dissatisfaction with the government.
Letters from an American 20 implied HN points 11 Feb 25
  1. President Trump's administration has frozen government funding, causing problems for farmers who relied on promised financial aid. This has left them in tough situations after they've already made investments based on those promises.
  2. The courts are stepping in to challenge Trump's actions by enforcing the rule of law. Judges are ordering that frozen funds be released and blocking some of his controversial policies.
  3. There are growing concerns about Trump's approach to government and law, including his recent firings of key officials. Many are worried that this could undermine the system designed to keep checks and balances in place.
Who is Robert Malone 30 implied HN points 08 Feb 25
  1. The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) claims to fight corruption globally but is heavily funded by the US government, which raises questions about its true motives.
  2. OCCRP focuses on investigating foreign governments deemed hostile to US interests and now appears to influence political situations in allied countries as well, like India.
  3. There are concerns that OCCRP and similar organizations act as tools for the US government, potentially pushing for regime change and affecting the reputation of nations without them realizing it.
Points And Figures 799 implied HN points 07 Oct 24
  1. Many people wrongly believe that money from the government is free and doesn't have really costs associated with it. Government money actually comes from taxpayers, and there's no such thing as a free lunch.
  2. Loans and financial incentives, like student loan forgiveness, can create bad economic expectations and lead to bigger problems down the road. When the government gives money without a clear plan to pay it back, it burdens future generations.
  3. There are better solutions for improving education and the economy, like school choice and reducing government involvement in funding. Allowing the market to dictate provides more opportunities and encourages personal responsibility.
Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way 4543 implied HN points 03 Oct 23
  1. The two-party system is collapsing, leading to a one-party system.
  2. The GOP establishment is aligned with Democrats, pushing for uni-party rule.
  3. There is a battle within the GOP between Matt Gaetz and Kevin McCarthy, highlighting broken promises and alliances with Democrats.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 211 implied HN points 05 Dec 24
  1. The U.S. State Department spends a lot of money to influence media coverage against its rivals. This shows how powerful and coordinated media can be.
  2. Many journalists and media outlets may not realize they are being funded or influenced by the U.S. government. This raises questions about the independence of journalism.
  3. People notice that despite having many different media outlets, they often share the same viewpoints. This suggests there might be stronger connections among them than we think.
I Might Be Wrong 10 implied HN points 13 Feb 25
  1. Funding cuts can greatly affect projects and initiatives. Losing a major funding source can lead to the cancellation of planned activities and changes in future goals.
  2. Creative and provocative content can be put on hold or altered when financial realities change. This can include unique or controversial series that rely on funding to be produced.
  3. Adapting to new circumstances often requires scaling back ambitions. Organizations may need to rethink their events and outreach programs when facing budget constraints.
Discourse Blog 1061 implied HN points 05 Oct 23
  1. Retailers are using the narrative of organized theft to justify store closures, blame financial downturns, and push for harsher laws and increased police funding.
  2. There is doubt and skepticism about the actual extent and impact of organized retail theft, despite widespread media coverage and corporate claims.
  3. The response to the perceived rise in theft includes enhanced security measures, stricter laws, and significant funding for law enforcement, generating concerns about over-policing and reinforcing damaging narratives.
steigan.no 7 implied HN points 07 Feb 25
  1. There are strong calls from many medical professionals and organizations to remove COVID-19 vaccines from the market due to concerns about safety and significant health risks.
  2. Recent discussions between Russia and the USA regarding Ukraine suggest a potential shift in strategy, with the USA looking for new elections in Ukraine to facilitate negotiations.
  3. CRISPR technology is being considered in Norway for gene editing in agriculture, but there are ongoing debates about the risks and regulations surrounding its use.
Letters from an American 17 implied HN points 21 Dec 24
  1. The House of Representatives passed a temporary funding measure to keep the government running and provide disaster relief. This shows ongoing division within the Republican Party and their struggle over government spending.
  2. Elon Musk influenced Republican lawmakers to reject a bipartisan agreement, which raises concerns about an unelected billionaire having significant power over government decisions. Many people worry about what this means for democracy and accountability.
  3. Despite challenges, House leadership found enough support to pass the funding measure with both Republican and Democratic votes. This situation reveals that cooperation is necessary to prevent a government shutdown and support important programs.
The Dossier 354 implied HN points 13 Feb 24
  1. American 'foreign aid' to Ukraine is mostly spent in the United States, benefiting Beltway corporations
  2. Government spending on defense does not create real jobs or value, but adds to the national debt and inflation
  3. These 'foreign aid' bills serve as stimulus for the Beltway elite rather than enhancing national security
Public 287 implied HN points 16 Nov 23
  1. The Government-backed Stanford group censored Republicans for claims but not Democrats.
  2. Republicans faced censorship for election fraud claims while similar claims by Democrats went unchecked.
  3. Stanford's biased censorship efforts raise concerns about government influence on freedom of speech.
OpenTheBooks Substack 234 implied HN points 29 Aug 23
  1. California schools are teaching that genders are limitless and encourage inventing new genders.
  2. Governor Newsom's administration is funneling millions of taxpayer dollars into promoting neogenders.
  3. Gender Spectrum organization's initiatives can exclude parents and keep them in the dark about their child's gender transitions.
OpenTheBooks Substack 108 implied HN points 27 Feb 24
  1. The federal government has funded numerous podcasts on various topics, including agriculture, linguistics, and religious life, some with ideologically charged content.
  2. The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) have primary roles in funding podcasts for artistic and cultural expression.
  3. Many Americans might view the government-funded podcasts as wasteful spending, especially in light of the increasing national debt and the questionable topics covered.
Something to Consider 139 implied HN points 26 Feb 23
  1. Speeding is harmful because it puts others at risk, so fines are necessary to discourage it. Fines should be proportional to the danger caused, but not excessively punitive to allow for justified speeding in some situations.
  2. Traffic fines should not depend on a driver's income. A speeding rich driver harms others just as much as a poor driver, and fines should reflect that without deterring all speeding, especially in cases where it's efficient.
  3. Instead of relying on fines for profit, speeding should be treated like a toll based on the risk caused. This way, the focus is on protecting others rather than just generating revenue.
HEALTH CARE un-covered 219 implied HN points 16 Aug 22
  1. The largest for-profit insurance companies made $43.8 billion in profits and had $620.6 billion in revenue, mostly from taxpayer money. This shows how much they benefit financially from government programs.
  2. Three major insurers control 80% of the pharmacy benefit market. This means they have a huge influence over how prescription medications are managed and priced.
  3. A large number of Americans are underinsured, with 43.4% lacking sufficient coverage. This highlights a growing issue in healthcare, where many people struggle to afford medical care despite having insurance.
The Good Science Project 18 implied HN points 21 Feb 24
  1. The debate around NIH's march-in rights intersects with concerns over potentially overpriced pharmaceuticals developed with NIH funding.
  2. Empirical evidence suggests that very few drugs could be subject to NIH's march-in rights due to limited NIH funding directly impacting drug development.
  3. The application of march-in rights under Bayh-Dole is complex legally and practically, with challenges such as potential lawsuits over arbitrary interpretation and limited impact on drug pricing.
Weaponized 51 implied HN points 17 Apr 23
  1. Elon Musk needs to take responsibility for his decisions, especially if he associates with controversial figures.
  2. Proper interviews with Elon Musk should provide challenging questions about his platform management, decision-making, and claims.
  3. Elon Musk should be held accountable for actions such as re-platforming neo-Nazis and dismantling Twitter's verification system.
JoeWrote 29 implied HN points 26 Sep 23
  1. The National Parks Service is a successful government program that shows government can work well.
  2. National Parks Service has a clear mission and funding that leads to exceeding expectations and building a better society.
  3. The NPS is effective, with high visitation rates, economic benefits, and professional services that showcase the value of government programs.
Letters from an American 9 implied HN points 01 Mar 24
  1. MAGA Republicans are struggling in negotiations to fund the government and pass the national security supplemental bill, with Biden trying to weaken them by highlighting their role in preventing new border security legislation.
  2. House Republicans backed off expecting a shutdown and instead passed a short-term continuing resolution to extend funding deadlines, showing divisions within the party.
  3. The struggle for control between Biden and Trump was evident in their contrasting views on immigration in Texas, with Trump blaming Biden for migrant-related issues while Biden emphasized the need for government action to address the situation.
Hypertext 0 implied HN points 27 Mar 24
  1. Experimentation and evaluation are crucial in discovering effective social solutions; funding should consider reinvestment in programs with null results for improvements.
  2. Interpreting null findings from programs is important; reasons for ineffectiveness could range from program inefficacy to delivery issues or changing environments.
  3. Being cautious in prioritizing 'evidence-based' programs is necessary; it may hinder innovation and obstruct the quest for better solutions.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 15 Mar 12
  1. Congress members have a budget called the Member's Representational Allowance (MRA) to pay for staff, travel, and office expenses. This budget is determined by distance from Washington, cost of living, and the number of voters in their district.
  2. Currently, each member has about $1.4 million to $1.5 million for these expenses, which is significantly less than the $20 million suggested for better staffing. Many representatives are hesitant to increase their budgets due to political pressures from voters.
  3. Increasing staff budgets could help Congress function better, but it's hard to achieve because voters generally don't support higher spending for their representatives or their staff. Any change would likely need to be subtle and carefully managed.