Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Steve Kirsch's newsletter focuses on critiquing COVID-19 mitigation policies, vaccines, alleged corruption, censorship, and promotes early treatments. It presents data and personal testimonies to argue that vaccines have negative health impacts, challenges official narratives, and engages with censorship issues while advocating for transparency and open discussion.

COVID-19 Policies Vaccine Safety and Efficacy Public Health Corruption Censorship and Free Speech Early COVID-19 Treatments Data Transparency Legal and Ethical Issues in Healthcare Personal Health Freedom

The hottest Substack posts of Steve Kirsch's newsletter

And their main takeaways
6 implied HN points β€’ 04 Nov 24
  1. Fluoride in drinking water is a controversial issue, with conflicting views on whether it is helpful or harmful.
  2. There was significant debate within the NIH, with two groups arguing different sides of the fluoride issue.
  3. To address such disputes effectively, it might help to create a competing government body or agency that can challenge existing beliefs.
2 implied HN points β€’ 13 Feb 25
  1. There's a live event about a serious topic involving white fibrous clots in bodies. Many embalmers have reported seeing these clots more often, which is concerning.
  2. Experts will discuss a possible blood test that could help people find out if they're affected by these dangerous clots. It's important for everyone to stay informed about their health.
  3. The event will feature professionals from different fields sharing their insights. This could shed light on the science behind these clots and what it means for our health.
3 implied HN points β€’ 11 Jan 25
  1. There is a survey asking people who work in offices to report COVID cases among vaccinated and unvaccinated coworkers. This helps gather data on how well the vaccines are working.
  2. The survey results show that 90% of vaccinated individuals and 56% of unvaccinated individuals got COVID, which suggests vaccinated people may be getting COVID more often.
  3. It's important for people to contribute their experiences to understand the real impact of vaccinations in workplaces. Sharing this information can help paint a clearer picture of the situation.
6 implied HN points β€’ 16 Oct 24
  1. Studies show that the COVID vaccines are not the same, with some evidence suggesting Moderna could be more harmful than Pfizer. However, there are questions about the reliability of this data.
  2. If one vaccine is found to be unsafe and causes problems, it suggests that the other vaccine may also be harmful. Both brands might have serious side effects that need to be acknowledged.
  3. There's a significant lack of transparency in the research data about the vaccines, making it hard to get clear answers on their safety and effectiveness.
3 implied HN points β€’ 01 Jan 25
  1. There is a survey for people working in medical offices who have experienced patient deaths since 2021. This survey aims to gather important information from these healthcare workers.
  2. Participants in the survey can help share their experiences and insights related to patient deaths in their practice. Their input could contribute to understanding trends or issues in healthcare.
  3. The call for responses highlights the importance of collecting data on patient safety and outcomes in medical settings. This information can be valuable for improving healthcare practices.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
5 implied HN points β€’ 01 Nov 24
  1. It’s important to find reliable data sources to understand the COVID vaccine's impact on safety and effectiveness. Good data helps answer important questions about health.
  2. Key questions include how vaccines affect infection risk, death rates from COVID, and overall mortality rates. These questions guide the research on vaccine impact.
  3. Some of the best data sources for these questions include worldwide COVID case numbers, nursing home COVID data in the US, and detailed records from the Czech Republic.
2 implied HN points β€’ 29 Jan 25
  1. The VSRF LIVE episode features Catherine Austin Fitts, who discusses important topics like government fraud and public health. She has experience in finance and government, making her insights valuable.
  2. Catherine has criticized the influence of hidden groups on public institutions, linking it to issues like the COVID-19 pandemic. Her views raise awareness about financial accountability.
  3. The show relies on public support and donations to continue, emphasizing the importance of community involvement in promoting health freedom. It encourages sharing and participation to reach a wider audience.
19 implied HN points β€’ 22 Jan 24
  1. The New Zealand data leaked by whistleblower Barry Young indicates that COVID vaccines may increase the risk of death.
  2. The data analysis revealed concerning trends like increased mortality rates after certain vaccine doses.
  3. Challenges in getting responses from scientists and authorities call for a court hearing to address the vaccine-related concerns.
16 implied HN points β€’ 05 Mar 24
  1. The Tucker Carlson interview had a massive positive response with over 100K likes and 6.6M views.
  2. Steve Kirsch discussed controversial topics like the link between vaccines and autism during the interview.
  3. Tucker Carlson himself praised the interview, inviting Steve Kirsch back onto the show in the future.
15 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 24
  1. Parents who vaccinate their children can face accusations of shaken baby syndrome when their child develops encephalitis soon after vaccination, which can lead to permanent brain injury.
  2. Physicians may report these parents to Child Protective Services, attributing the child's condition to shaken baby syndrome rather than vaccine complications.
  3. There is a growing trend of parents losing custody of their children due to accusations of shaken baby syndrome following vaccination, especially with COVID vaccines in the mix.
4 implied HN points β€’ 24 Oct 24
  1. A graph shows that vaccinated people are much less likely to die from COVID compared to those who are unvaccinated. This sounds convincing to get vaccinated.
  2. However, the graph might be misleading and doesn't tell the full story behind the numbers.
  3. The author offers more insights about why the graph is deceptive and argues against getting vaccinated.
15 implied HN points β€’ 26 Jan 24
  1. Lara Logan knows 20 people who died from the COVID vaccine but only 1 who died from the COVID virus.
  2. There are only two possibilities: the vaccine killed at least 5X as many people as the virus, or Lara is lying.
  3. Poisson distributions never lie - if there are such extreme statistics, there's something to be questioned about vaccine safety.
12 implied HN points β€’ 15 Mar 24
  1. The individual made multiple attempts to contact the FDA regarding various concerns, but did not receive any response.
  2. Despite lack of response, the individual was able to connect with a live member of FDA media relations leadership and presented their offer for a public dialog to address differences.
  3. While unsure of FDA's willingness to engage in public discussion, the individual finds the connection made with FDA media relations leadership intriguing.
15 implied HN points β€’ 14 Jan 24
  1. New Medicare data suggests that COVID vaccines may have increased mortality rates, contradicting promises of safety and efficacy.
  2. Unvaccinated individuals appeared to fare better in terms of mortality since April 2022, challenging the need for booster shots after that time.
  3. Flu vaccines also show concerning mortality rates, suggesting unsafe practices and lack of benefit.
12 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 24
  1. Harvard achieves scientific consensus by eliminating dissenting voices, creating an atmosphere of intimidation and silencing.
  2. There is a lack of transparency at Harvard regarding decisions, like dropping the COVID vaccination mandate, leading to questions about accountability.
  3. The message from Harvard to their faculty is clear: Follow instructions without questioning to avoid repercussions, which raises concerns about academic freedom.
13 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The CDC has released V-safe free-text comments to show the serious safety problems associated with the COVID vaccine.
  2. There are nearly 400,000 comments in the release, highlighting a variety of negative symptoms and reactions.
  3. Using testimonials from V-safe comments could be a powerful marketing tool to encourage vaccine uptake.
13 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The paper critical of COVID vaccines will be retracted by the journal Cureus due to multiple concerns with the validity of the work.
  2. The decision to retract the paper was final, with an extensive listing of concerns to support the retraction, creating no room for appeal or discussion.
  3. Public debates or challenges regarding the retraction are unlikely to happen, highlighting the power dynamics in scientific publishing where journals ultimately determine truth.
12 implied HN points β€’ 05 Mar 24
  1. A pathologist in Croatia reported a 52% increase in cancer risk for ages 15-59 who were vaccinated.
  2. The study showed that vaccinated individuals had a higher risk of developing carcinomas compared to unvaccinated individuals.
  3. The pathologist does not recommend vaccinations and most people in Croatia are hesitant to get vaccinated despite medical recommendations.
12 implied HN points β€’ 22 Feb 24
  1. The study analyzed 99 million vaccinated individuals, claiming the benefits outweigh the risks, but critics disagree due to concerns about safety signals and limitations of the study.
  2. There is skepticism about the benefits of the COVID vaccine, with questions raised about its effectiveness and the reported adverse events, as well as the lack of transparency in sharing data.
  3. The discussion revolves around the comparison of risks between the COVID vaccine and the virus, particularly focusing on adverse events like myocarditis, highlighting conflicting findings in various studies.
12 implied HN points β€’ 06 Feb 24
  1. Large geriatric practice reported a 3X increase in deaths after COVID vaccine rollout.
  2. The nurse with 35 years of experience observed that all deceased patients were vaccinated, and the deaths were attributed to the shots.
  3. Question raised about lack of success cases where mortality significantly decreased after COVID vaccines were administered.
2 implied HN points β€’ 12 Dec 24
  1. The discussion will focus on the rising number of sepsis cases worldwide and possible links to COVID-19 and its vaccines. Sepsis is a serious condition, and it's important for people to understand its implications.
  2. Experts in the field will join to share insights, including a prominent virologist and a leading doctor on sepsis treatment. Their perspectives may help shed light on why this increase is happening.
  3. The event encourages community participation, aiming to inform people on health safety this winter. It's a good opportunity to learn and share information with friends and family.
10 implied HN points β€’ 17 Mar 24
  1. Gates Foundation doesn't want a public discussion to address COVID vaccine misinformation
  2. The author proposed involving 'misinformation spreaders' and Gates Foundation experts in a dialogue, but received no response
  3. The foundation chose not to engage in resolving differences on vaccine safety and efficacy through open conversation
12 implied HN points β€’ 26 Jan 24
  1. Trying to hide public health information is never a good idea, especially when pushing a vaccine.
  2. Health New Zealand is attempting to censor information, but refuses to explain data discrepancies.
  3. Public discussion and transparency are crucial when it comes to public health issues like this.
10 implied HN points β€’ 02 Mar 24
  1. Seven MPs have requested comprehensive data transparency from the UK ONS, aiming to unveil the truth behind COVID vaccine data with a detailed analysis.
  2. The MPs' request is backed by UK Professors Norman Fenton and Carl Heneghan, adding credibility to their efforts towards accountability and transparency.
  3. The UK ONS is in a precarious position as they cannot easily refuse the request, obligated to comply due to the scientifically sound nature of the analysis and privacy protection highlighted by experts.
11 implied HN points β€’ 25 Jan 24
  1. Author offered to redact any records revealing private health information to challenge Health New Zealand
  2. Epidemiologists might have to testify about vaccine safety and efficacy in a New Zealand court
  3. This opportunity could challenge the safe and effective narrative about vaccines and help exonerate Barry
10 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The New Zealand OIA request revealed that COVID vaccines were found to increase the risk of dying, instead of providing protection against COVID.
  2. The data released under OIA showed that vaccinated individuals experienced a significant increase in mortality during the COVID outbreak, contrary to what was expected.
  3. Mainstream epidemiologists have avoided analyzing the data that shows the vaccines increased the risk of dying from COVID, leading to a lack of public discussion and questioning.
9 implied HN points β€’ 16 Mar 24
  1. A recent Thailand clinical trial showed 100% effectiveness in preventing COVID hospitalizations with a 2-drug combination, in contrast to the 37.5% hospitalization rate with standard care.
  2. The early treatment combination of fluvoxamine and another drug displayed clear benefits in preventing hospitalizations and reducing serious adverse events, unlike the COVID vaccines.
  3. Despite strong evidence and successful outcomes of multi-drug treatments since early 2020, health authorities and organizations like CDC, FDA, and WHO continue to overlook and ignore these effective treatment options.
2 implied HN points β€’ 25 Nov 24
  1. An attorney and plaintiff are discussing a major legal case where a woman won nearly $13 million after being fired for refusing a COVID-19 vaccine. This case is significant for discussions about vaccine mandates and religious freedom.
  2. Lisa Domski, the plaintiff, was working remotely and had documented her religious beliefs but was still let go from her job. This highlights issues of workplace discrimination related to vaccine mandates.
  3. The conversation will also touch on the broader implications for others who are facing similar situations. Attendees will gain insights into the legal landscape surrounding vaccine mandates.