Unmasked

Unmasked focuses on critical analysis of COVID-19 policies, questioning the efficacy of masks, vaccination strategies, and public health leadership. It features discussions on natural immunity, media misinformation, and critiques of government and health officials' handling of the pandemic, spotlighting perceived contradictions and failures.

COVID-19 Policies and Critiques Vaccination Efficacy and Strategy Mask Mandates and Effectiveness Public Health Leadership and Trust Natural Immunity Media Misinformation Governmental Responses to COVID-19

The hottest Substack posts of Unmasked

And their main takeaways
46 implied HN points β€’ 06 Mar 25
  1. Masks did not effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19, as shown by multiple studies over the years. Many places that enforced strict mask mandates still experienced high infection rates.
  2. Experts originally agreed that masks weren’t necessary for the general public, and later claims to the contrary were proven wrong. The research all along suggested masks wouldn't help during a pandemic.
  3. Experiments during the pandemic showed that forcing people, including children, to wear masks didn’t make a difference in controlling the virus, ultimately leading to a conclusion that the mandates were ineffective.
92 implied HN points β€’ 27 Feb 25
  1. There was a lot of misinformation about COVID vaccines when they came out. Experts made claims that were not supported by facts, leading to confusion about their effectiveness.
  2. Key figures like Dr. Fauci and Rochelle Walensky made statements that turned out to be incorrect, which worsened public trust and guided harmful policies.
  3. Recent research suggests that the long-term side effects of vaccines are more significant than previously acknowledged, highlighting ongoing issues around vaccine communication and transparency.
96 implied HN points β€’ 20 Feb 25
  1. A new study suggests that the risk of dying from COVID was much lower than previously thought. Many people believe this should have been clear from earlier data.
  2. COVID lockdowns and restrictions had huge impacts on society, like economic problems and lost learning for students. These issues continue to affect us today.
  3. The media and experts are often criticized for spreading fear and misinformation about COVID, which some say contributed to unnecessary restrictions and panic.
67 implied HN points β€’ 14 Feb 25
  1. Legacy media continues to blame others for their mistakes during the COVID-19 pandemic, refusing to acknowledge their own errors.
  2. There is a pattern of the elite using their influence to enforce unreasonable rules on the public, then blaming people for not following them.
  3. Articles in mainstream publications often contain misinformation and inaccuracies, causing frustration for those looking for truthful reporting.
75 implied HN points β€’ 07 Feb 25
  1. Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the World Health Organization (WHO) has been seen as a positive move. Many believe the WHO was corrupt and not helpful during the COVID pandemic.
  2. The WHO made mistakes by misreporting COVID's mortality rate, which caused unnecessary panic. They also promoted measures like masking without solid evidence backing them up.
  3. Countries like Sweden showed that it was possible to stay open during the pandemic without lockdowns. The WHO's strict measures did not provide real public health benefits and had harmful effects.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
54 implied HN points β€’ 10 Feb 25
  1. Anthony Fauci has admitted to lying during the COVID pandemic, suggesting he didn't always tell the truth about key issues.
  2. There are ongoing investigations that could still hold Fauci accountable despite any pardons he might receive.
  3. The discussion includes concerns about his decisions on public health measures, like lockdowns and vaccine mandates, which many feel were misleading.
73 implied HN points β€’ 30 Jan 25
  1. The left-wing media has struggled to accept the reality of COVID after five years. Many people feel that the media should show some humility after being wrong about key issues.
  2. Experts like Anthony Fauci, who had significant influence during the pandemic, are seen as having caused harm without taking responsibility. There's a belief that these figures should be held accountable for their misleading advice.
  3. Research suggests that COVID restrictions did not effectively control the spread of the virus and resulted in significant financial and social damage. Many people are questioning the value of these measures.
86 implied HN points β€’ 25 Jan 25
  1. COVID restrictions, like lockdowns and mask mandates, didn't really help stop the spread of the virus. They ended up costing a lot of money without making a difference.
  2. Many people still feel the effects of these restrictions today, like vaccine passports and other rules that came from government policies.
  3. After lifting restrictions, there weren't big spikes in COVID cases, which suggests that the rules might not have worked as intended.
69 implied HN points β€’ 21 Jan 25
  1. The Biden administration faced criticism for its early COVID policies, which many viewed as extreme and unnecessary. Many felt that pushing vaccines on young children was not justified.
  2. States that lifted mask mandates did better than those that kept them, showing that some COVID restrictions may not have been effective. This sparked debates about the effectiveness of mandates.
  3. There were significant efforts to censor opposing views on social media regarding COVID, and some policies, like vaccine passports, created controversy and division among Americans. Many were frustrated with these approaches.
83 implied HN points β€’ 15 Jan 25
  1. There is little evidence that N95 masks are effective, and they may cause significant side effects.
  2. Many health experts and officials seem unwilling to learn from past COVID-19 failures, which could lead to repeated mistakes.
  3. With the possibility of mask mandates returning, it's important for people to question the policies and their actual effectiveness.
113 implied HN points β€’ 24 Dec 24
  1. Masks have been debated since the pandemic began, but many experts still believe they don't work effectively. This has led to ongoing discussions among people who support or oppose their use.
  2. Past studies attempting to prove the effectiveness of masks have often been criticized for their flaws and misleading results. This has caused skepticism about the reliability of mask research.
  3. Recent studies that promote mask-wearing continue to fuel the belief among some groups, but they are viewed by others as inaccurate or propaganda. This division highlights the ongoing controversy over mask mandates.
86 implied HN points β€’ 03 Jan 25
  1. Some COVID-19 policies were based on arrogance and made without admitting they failed. It's worrying when experts ignore their mistakes and push for restrictions continuously.
  2. The pandemic showed how dangerous it is when authority figures act with big egos and lack accountability. This issue hasn't disappeared even years later.
  3. Despite all the evidence against them, some people still believe in the effectiveness of masks. Many experts have criticized masks, saying they haven't worked as promised.
73 implied HN points β€’ 08 Jan 25
  1. The CDC made mistakes in managing COVID-19, like failing to roll out tests properly and giving confusing mask advice. This led to a lot of public criticism.
  2. Their guidance on masks changed too many times without strong evidence to support the changes. They often relied on poor studies that were quickly disproven.
  3. Despite the backlash and criticism, the CDC didn't seem to learn from their mistakes or adjust their approach effectively during the pandemic.
130 implied HN points β€’ 20 Nov 24
  1. Sweden's approach to COVID-19, particularly regarding masks, suggests that their policies were more effective compared to strict mandates. Many believe masks didn't help much, and the data supports this view.
  2. Experts' predictions and mandates around masks and vaccines were often incorrect, leading to public distrust. A lot of information from that time is either ignored or downplayed now.
  3. Recent studies reinforce that Sweden's strategies during the pandemic were valid while challenging the widely accepted methods enforced elsewhere. This raises questions about what really works in handling health crises.
79 implied HN points β€’ 12 Dec 24
  1. There is no solid evidence showing that wearing masks helps stop the spread of respiratory viruses like COVID-19. Many studies from before 2020 found that masks are not effective.
  2. Despite the lack of evidence, some people continue to insist that more masking would have made a difference during the pandemic.
  3. It's important to recognize that a lot of the information about masks has been based on political beliefs rather than scientific facts.
52 implied HN points β€’ 28 Dec 24
  1. Gain of function research in Wuhan might have played a role in the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of research involves modifying viruses to understand their effects.
  2. Anthony Fauci was involved in supporting this risky research, which has led to questions about accountability. His actions have been under scrutiny regarding the origins of COVID-19.
  3. Recent reports suggest that important findings about COVID's origins were not shared with top officials in the U.S. government. This lack of communication raises concerns about transparency and decision-making.
96 implied HN points β€’ 27 Nov 24
  1. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya has been appointed as the head of the National Institutes of Health. He is highly qualified with degrees in medicine and health policy.
  2. His appointment is seen as a challenge to previous leadership at NIH, particularly to Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, as he supports evidence-based science rather than political ideology.
  3. The media is reacting negatively to his appointment because he has publicly opposed strict COVID-19 measures like lockdowns and mask mandates.
62 implied HN points β€’ 17 Dec 24
  1. A new study funded by the CDC shows that some vaccinated children may actually be more likely to get COVID. This surprises many who thought the vaccines would fully protect them.
  2. Many countries in Europe did not recommend COVID vaccines for children, raising questions about their necessity and safety in the U.S.
  3. There's a growing distrust in public health guidelines as experts appear to have given mixed messages on vaccines and their effectiveness.
125 implied HN points β€’ 06 Nov 24
  1. Many experts during the COVID-19 pandemic failed to remain unbiased and instead became political advocates. This led to a loss of trust from the public.
  2. The phrase 'follow the science' was often used to dismiss individual opinions, which made it hard for some people to voice their concerns or disagreements.
  3. Despite low trust ratings in health agencies and experts, there does not seem to be a push for humility or respect from them towards the public.
73 implied HN points β€’ 04 Dec 24
  1. There is a lot of inconsistency around mask-wearing, showing that some people don't practice what they preach. This hypocrisy has been a constant theme since the start of the pandemic.
  2. Even after several years, certain groups remain very strict about masking and other COVID rules, highlighting a strong commitment to these behaviors.
  3. New data, like what some found in Sweden, continues to challenge the effectiveness of masks, sparking debates about their true value during the pandemic.
86 implied HN points β€’ 14 Nov 24
  1. Anthony Fauci has admitted to lying about herd immunity levels to encourage vaccinations. This shows a willingness to manipulate facts for perceived greater good.
  2. He avoids responsibility for school closures, even though he made public claims supporting those closures at the time. This suggests he uses language carefully to distance himself from backlash.
  3. Recent emails released from Fauci show patterns of dishonesty, leading to decreased public trust in him and health authorities. Many people now doubt the credibility of public health experts.
50 implied HN points β€’ 07 Dec 24
  1. The U.S. government made serious mistakes in handling COVID, according to an official report. It shows many leaders, including Dr. Fauci and President Biden, didn't act as they should have.
  2. A dedicated committee investigated the government's actions during the pandemic. Their findings reveal a lot about the failures and missteps along the way.
  3. Some people want to forget the harsh COVID rules and how they were enforced. However, there are ongoing efforts to remember and understand what actually happened.
75 implied HN points β€’ 12 Oct 24
  1. Mask mandates are returning in some areas, like California, as winter approaches. This has happened repeatedly since 2020.
  2. There is a belief that these mask mandates have failed to prevent illness in the past. Many are questioning why they are being reinstated again.
  3. Some people feel that there is a lot of misinformation surrounding the mask policies and the studies supporting them. This creates confusion about their actual effectiveness.
69 implied HN points β€’ 18 Oct 24
  1. The media played a big role in promoting strict COVID measures like masks and lockdowns, which affected people's freedoms. They often focused on one side of the story and spread misinformation.
  2. Public health officials seriously influenced the response to the pandemic, sometimes ignoring new evidence in favor of their existing beliefs and practices. This led to many damaging decisions during the crisis.
  3. There's now a plan to limit the power of public health authorities and prevent extreme measures from happening again. The hope is to create a more balanced and informed approach in the future.
56 implied HN points β€’ 24 Oct 24
  1. The Biden Administration is said to have misled many people about COVID-19, which caused a lot of harm.
  2. A new report claims that they wasted nearly a billion dollars on spreading incorrect information about the pandemic.
  3. This situation may have made the spread of COVID-19 worse and raised questions about how health authorities communicated.
50 implied HN points β€’ 30 Oct 24
  1. The media and some leaders push a strong message that everyone should get vaccinated against respiratory viruses. This view has become widely accepted, even if it might not be entirely based on evidence.
  2. Many claims about the consequences of not getting vaccinated, like severe illness and death, turned out to be exaggerated. This raises questions about the truth behind the common vaccination messaging.
  3. There is a growing concern that the push for universal vaccination against all respiratory viruses may be an overreach, not fully supported by scientific evidence about their effectiveness.
37 implied HN points β€’ 13 Nov 24
  1. Dr. Anthony Fauci has been accused of misleading the public and not being honest during his media appearances and testimony.
  2. He reportedly used a private email for work-related communication to hide information, which raises concerns about transparency.
  3. Despite controversies, Fauci continues to receive significant benefits funded by taxpayers.
58 implied HN points β€’ 09 Oct 24
  1. A recent study that supported mask-wearing has been proven wrong. This adds to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of masks.
  2. Some people believe that experts used misleading information to support their views on mask mandates, especially for children.
  3. There's a growing concern that some mask policies may have hurt kids more than helped them, highlighting a need to rethink health measures.
151 implied HN points β€’ 25 Feb 24
  1. The media is pushing for people to wear N95 masks indefinitely, despite lack of evidence on their effectiveness
  2. Vaccines and boosters are being portrayed as insufficient protection against viruses, encouraging continued mask-wearing
  3. Misinformation in the media is causing confusion by spreading inaccurate claims about rising COVID infections and the effectiveness of N95 masks
102 implied HN points β€’ 01 Mar 24
  1. COVID vaccines have faced challenges like waning protection, ineffective boosters, and increased side effect risks.
  2. The CDC approved multiple additional vaccine doses, bringing the total up to nine, but none guarantee protection against infection or transmission.
  3. Recent congressional testimony raised concerns about the early days of COVID vaccine approval.
88 implied HN points β€’ 06 Mar 24
  1. Booster mandates in colleges may have harmed millions of students, causing potentially damaging side effects without significant health benefits.
  2. An admission from a former FDA director highlighted flaws in the COVID vaccine approval process, leading to unnecessary mandates for young individuals.
  3. Specific data is being gathered to reveal the harmful impact of these mandates on college students, shedding light on the negative consequences.
98 implied HN points β€’ 01 Feb 24
  1. Some individuals in the media are pushing for the return of masks due to concerns about a new variant and panic.
  2. Certain experts are criticized for not admitting to mistakes and promoting policies that are viewed as ineffective.
  3. There is ongoing debate about the effectiveness of COVID policies, including advocating for vaccination over natural immunity.
79 implied HN points β€’ 16 Mar 24
  1. The COVID pandemic is considered over by many, despite ongoing restrictions like masking and mandates.
  2. Lockdowns caused major economic issues without effectively reducing virus spread or providing significant benefits.
  3. Elite institutions like Harvard shifted focus to promoting ideologies over truth during the COVID era.