The claim is made that there was no global pandemic of COVID-19, and that the response to it was more harmful than the virus itself.
The message asserts that the deaths seen during the pandemic were not due to the virus, but rather from medical treatment and management.
There is skepticism around the idea of asymptomatic spread of the virus, and a strong belief that the response to the pandemic was driven by false information and lies.
The response to COVID had characteristics of a coup orchestrated by the western intelligence community.
Western intelligence authorities were behind key aspects of the COVID response, like social distancing policies and pandemic simulations.
The illiberalism and propaganda in the COVID response were driven by the western intelligence community, pointing to potential corruption and influence.
Prior to the COVID lockdowns, discussions about the virus were rational and reassuring, with very few advocating for global adoption of China's lockdown policy.
Balaji Srinivasan made detailed tweets predicting the global response to COVID before many major changes occurred, such as wearing masks, shifting to remote work, and reducing vaccine approval time.
Despite Balaji's accurate predictions, there are questions about his motives and the coordination of global COVID policies, suggesting a potential plan to implement China's response globally.
The discussion around qualified immunity, Great Barrington Declaration, and herd immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic raised complexities and challenges in their practical implementation.
Patrick Vallance's statement on 'building up some kind of herd immunity' during the early stages of the pandemic was scrutinized, highlighting the complexity and potential consequences of different approaches.
The importance of vaccines in ending the pandemic was emphasized, while also prompting consideration of alternative strategies if vaccines were not available.
Crimes against humanity like the global Covid response demand not just condemnation, but also justice and vengeance.
A crime against humanity calls for fitting punishments such as life in prison or capital punishment, distinguishing it from regular crimes.
The necessity for justice for crimes against humanity necessitates difficult conversations, advocacy for accountability, and an unyielding fight for truth and justice.