The hottest Partisanship Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Erdmann Housing Tracker 84 implied HN points 02 May 23
  1. There was misinformation spread about Biden increasing fees for good credit homebuyers to subsidize those with risky credit scores.
  2. The misinformation was fueled by cherry-picked data and politically charged language in articles from various news sources.
  3. The real issue at hand is an actuarial decision about fee structures, and the impact on mortgage access post-Great Recession.
Brain Lenses 19 implied HN points 30 Mar 23
  1. Negative partisanship is when some voters base their political opinions on who they dislike, not who they like.
  2. Traditional partisanship involves some dislike for the opposing team, but is more about central democratic tenets and country values.
  3. Negative partisanship is believed to be a factor in political polarization and increased tribal rhetoric in many countries.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist 16 implied HN points 04 Aug 23
  1. Trump has been indicted for serious crimes, revealing concerning details about his character and past remarks.
  2. There is a growing divide in America, with strong animosity and contempt between different groups of people, leading to a worrisome future.
  3. The political landscape in the U.S. is tense, with a significant portion supporting Trump amid concerns for the country's stability and future.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
American Dreaming 3 HN points 12 Feb 24
  1. Primaries were meant to bring more democracy by letting voters help choose candidates, but the system often leads to unsatisfying choices due to low voter turnout.
  2. The primary system replaced party bosses with a more democratic candidate selection process, but voter participation remains low, favoring extremists and special interests.
  3. Abolishing primaries in favor of ranked-choice voting could lead to better candidate selection and reduce the influence of partisanship, extremism, and special interests in elections.
Symbolic Capital(ism) 39 implied HN points 27 Aug 19
  1. Highly educated individuals may not always make decisions based on facts or logic as commonly believed; they exhibit biases and are less likely to change their beliefs when presented with contradictory evidence.
  2. The growing education divide between political parties does not necessarily indicate one party's superiority in terms of policy or effectiveness; being educated does not guarantee better political judgment.
  3. Academics and intellectuals should be wary of elitism and condescension towards less educated individuals and their political views, as education level does not always correlate with rational or informed political leanings.
the rohn report 19 implied HN points 18 Oct 20
  1. Notice societal signs and signals during turbulent times. Look for undercurrent movements like self-awareness and self-sufficiency.
  2. Imagine a government that serves the people cooperatively and effectively. Consider the radical idea of reshaping governance.
  3. Embrace creativity and unity to pave the way for new systems and solutions. Don't be confined by current divides; explore new possibilities.
The India Uncut Newsletter 0 implied HN points 24 Jan 24
  1. Two main approaches to bringing about change: Insiders and Outsiders.
  2. Outsiders might focus on moving the Overton Window and playing the long game, while Insiders work on making incremental changes.
  3. Both Insiders and Outsiders can face challenges with unprincipled individuals, but there are also genuine and valuable contributors from both groups.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 11 Jan 19
  1. The National Emergency Gambit is a strategy that's gaining traction in DC. It gives both parties a way to save face while avoiding tough negotiations on immigration.
  2. Most political candidates you hear about are already in the running during the Invisible Primary phase. They're testing support and connections even before officially announcing a campaign.
  3. Senate Democrats aren't pushing harder on the shutdown issue because they fear losing power. Their leader prefers to maintain a controlled environment rather than risk unruly debates.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 16 Feb 18
  1. The 115th Congress went through three phases: a partisan phase where the GOP pushed its agenda, a bipartisan phase focused on cooperation, and now appears to be entering a stalemate phase with little major legislation expected.
  2. There is confusion around the DACA issue, as some believe Democrats prefer it as a campaign topic rather than pushing for a policy solution. Both parties seem to be balancing their legislative strategies with upcoming elections in mind.
  3. Gun control faces challenges because intense minority opinions, like those from the NRA, can overshadow majority support. This dynamic shows how powerful dedicated interest groups can be in influencing Congress.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 01 Mar 12
  1. The system of government is designed to prevent majority rule, which can sometimes hinder consensus. There are many features, like the filibuster, that make it harder for one party to dominate policy-making.
  2. People often focus on the filibuster as the main reason for legislative gridlock, but it might not be as crucial as other factors. Even without it, there can still be significant barriers to passing laws.
  3. Removing the filibuster won't necessarily lead to more compromise. Instead, it could change how power operates in Congress without improving representation or leading to better decision-making.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 21 Dec 11
  1. Representatives serve shorter terms and pay closer attention to the immediate needs of their constituents. Senators have longer terms, so they can focus on long-term issues without the pressure of frequent elections.
  2. The rules and structures of the House and Senate are different, leading to different power dynamics. The House allows majority rule, while the Senate requires more consensus for decisions, creating potential conflicts.
  3. Voters may have different expectations for their Representatives and Senators. This can affect how each chamber approaches policy decisions and negotiations with each other.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 26 Sep 11
  1. It's important to separate anti-incumbency from partisan landslides when looking at elections. Mixing them up can make it harder to understand voter behavior.
  2. Anti-incumbency can be seen in polling, but it doesn't always lead to big changes in election outcomes. Voters often just move against one party rather than against incumbents overall.
  3. True anti-incumbency has specific signs, like many incumbents losing while the total number of party seats stays the same. This shows voters are rejecting their own party's members.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 05 Aug 10
  1. Deliberation in politics is not just about talking; it's about finding and voting on the best ideas. When someone proposes a better idea, it should win if most agree.
  2. The Senate allows for more input on ideas compared to the House, which often restricts amendments and discussion. This can lead to a lack of representation for popular ideas in the House.
  3. Both the Senate and House have their issues: the Senate can be blocked by a minority, while the House often silences majority support. Finding a balance between the two is challenging but important.