The hottest Partisanship Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Public 287 implied HN points 16 Nov 23
  1. The Government-backed Stanford group censored Republicans for claims but not Democrats.
  2. Republicans faced censorship for election fraud claims while similar claims by Democrats went unchecked.
  3. Stanford's biased censorship efforts raise concerns about government influence on freedom of speech.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Can We Still Govern? 215 implied HN points 15 Nov 23
  1. You can take action against Trump's attempt to politicize the federal government by commenting on a proposed rule to neuter Schedule F.
  2. Public comments on rules can influence policy decisions and help protect the independence of the bureaucracy.
  3. Increasing politicization of government agencies can lead to lower performance, reduced accountability, and less responsiveness to Congress and the public.
Silver Bulletin 334 implied HN points 20 Sep 23
  1. The election model became overwhelmingly popular, potentially overshadowing other content.
  2. The author is considering different strategies to manage the model's audience and impact.
  3. There are various options being considered, like putting the model behind a paywall or appealing to different types of audiences.
Silver Bulletin 227 implied HN points 08 Sep 23
  1. Stay sane during the 2024 election by either ignoring the race or pacing yourself.
  2. It's too early to get caught up in polling details right now.
  3. The main things to know about the current election race are Biden, Trump, or someone else could win, and the odds don't change significantly day to day.
Unsafe Science 223 implied HN points 16 Apr 23
  1. The study found that people were more likely to agree with negative statements when they were about white people compared to other racial groups.
  2. Political affiliation influenced the level of agreement with negative statements, with liberals showing higher agreement with anti-white sentiments.
  3. The research highlighted how tribalism and prejudice can influence attitudes towards different demographic groups.
Can We Still Govern? 154 implied HN points 02 May 23
  1. Schedule F could increase politicization in the American government by allowing more political appointees and weakening job protections for career officials.
  2. The Heritage Foundation is pushing for a plan that could jeopardize American democracy by undermining the civil service system and concentrating power with potential for authoritarian misuse.
  3. There is a need for the center-left to develop its own agenda focused on restoring American administrative capacity, balancing the concerns about government efficiency with safeguarding democratic principles.
Symposium 137 implied HN points 27 Feb 23
  1. The Symposium Foundation for the Study of Liberalism has been created to support intellectual defense of a free society.
  2. Current threats to liberalism come from corruption in established institutions on both the left and the right.
  3. New explicitly liberal institutions are needed to rebuild the case for a free society and bridge ideological divides.
Erdmann Housing Tracker 84 implied HN points 02 May 23
  1. There was misinformation spread about Biden increasing fees for good credit homebuyers to subsidize those with risky credit scores.
  2. The misinformation was fueled by cherry-picked data and politically charged language in articles from various news sources.
  3. The real issue at hand is an actuarial decision about fee structures, and the impact on mortgage access post-Great Recession.
The Radar 79 implied HN points 26 Mar 23
  1. Effective communication is essential for progress; without it, nothing can be achieved.
  2. Conflict is normal, but when unresolved, it can lead to disunity and loss of empathy.
  3. The decline in honest and fact-driven communication has led to a divisive national conversation fueled by biased media and financial interests.
American Dreaming 3 HN points 12 Feb 24
  1. Primaries were meant to bring more democracy by letting voters help choose candidates, but the system often leads to unsatisfying choices due to low voter turnout.
  2. The primary system replaced party bosses with a more democratic candidate selection process, but voter participation remains low, favoring extremists and special interests.
  3. Abolishing primaries in favor of ranked-choice voting could lead to better candidate selection and reduce the influence of partisanship, extremism, and special interests in elections.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist 16 implied HN points 04 Aug 23
  1. Trump has been indicted for serious crimes, revealing concerning details about his character and past remarks.
  2. There is a growing divide in America, with strong animosity and contempt between different groups of people, leading to a worrisome future.
  3. The political landscape in the U.S. is tense, with a significant portion supporting Trump amid concerns for the country's stability and future.
Brain Lenses 19 implied HN points 30 Mar 23
  1. Negative partisanship is when some voters base their political opinions on who they dislike, not who they like.
  2. Traditional partisanship involves some dislike for the opposing team, but is more about central democratic tenets and country values.
  3. Negative partisanship is believed to be a factor in political polarization and increased tribal rhetoric in many countries.
the rohn report 19 implied HN points 18 Oct 20
  1. Notice societal signs and signals during turbulent times. Look for undercurrent movements like self-awareness and self-sufficiency.
  2. Imagine a government that serves the people cooperatively and effectively. Consider the radical idea of reshaping governance.
  3. Embrace creativity and unity to pave the way for new systems and solutions. Don't be confined by current divides; explore new possibilities.
The India Uncut Newsletter 0 implied HN points 24 Jan 24
  1. Two main approaches to bringing about change: Insiders and Outsiders.
  2. Outsiders might focus on moving the Overton Window and playing the long game, while Insiders work on making incremental changes.
  3. Both Insiders and Outsiders can face challenges with unprincipled individuals, but there are also genuine and valuable contributors from both groups.