Immigrants do not necessarily solve labor shortages because they bring their own demand for various services and jobs.
Immigration can lead to lower wages, depending on the skills of the immigrants being admitted into the country.
The argument that immigration is needed to address labor shortages is often contested by voters who see other issues like welfare, crime, and decreasing wages.
There will not be durable deflation in the future unless major changes happen to the dollar or the Federal Reserve.
Technology like AI can lead to deflation by lowering prices, but central banks like the Federal Reserve counteract this by absorbing the deflation.
A special type of bad deflation occurs when dollars are taken out of circulation, often due to events like financial panics, leading to economic challenges.
The Federal Reserve is planning more interest rate hikes and tightening measures, signaling potential economic pain.
Despite initial expectations of a pause in rate hikes due to economic impacts not yet fully realized, Fed Governor Waller is advocating for further hikes to curb inflation.
Quantitative Tightening, the reversal of money printing, may be the next step for the Fed despite past failures, raising concerns of potential economic disruptions and widespread impacts.
Central bankers are blaming capitalists and workers for inflation to divert attention from their own actions.
Corporate profits and worker wages are being scapegoated for causing inflation, but in reality, they are a result of economic uncertainty and money printing.
The evolution from 'greedflation' to 'wageflation' is explained by the Cantillon effect, where trillions of dollars trickle down from government to workers, resulting in lost real wages and potential future economic challenges.
Debt ceiling is approaching, and the government is trying to scare voters with extreme consequences like starving schoolchildren and financial market defaults.
Negotiations involve significant spending cuts, particularly from rolling back spending to last year's level and applying a 1% annual cap for the next 10 years.
If government spending reduces by roughly 50%, it could lead to a surplus to pay down debt, suggesting a need to cut unconstitutional and unnecessary programs.