The hottest NATO Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Glenn’s Substack • 1718 implied HN points • 17 Sep 24
  1. NATO's support for Ukraine is often framed as a selfless act to help against Russia, but it may not align with what most Ukrainians actually want. Many Ukrainians have shown little interest in joining NATO.
  2. There have been several instances where peace agreements, such as the Minsk-2 agreement, were ignored or sabotaged by Western powers, showing that their true interests may lie elsewhere.
  3. The situation in Ukraine has led to severe consequences for the population, with many lives lost and a push towards nationalism and division, rather than unity and peace.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 2559 implied HN points • 16 Feb 26
  1. He gave a blunt, high-stakes critique of European complacency and questioned long-standing assumptions about the continent’s security.
  2. Even while challenging those sacred cows, he won over senior European leaders and received a standing ovation at the Munich Security Conference.
  3. The speech acted like an intervention — a stern warning that Europe risks squandering its security if it doesn’t change course.
Glenn’s Substack • 839 implied HN points • 09 Sep 24
  1. Germany and the EU need to rethink their approach to the Ukraine crisis or they might end up in serious trouble together. Changes are necessary to avoid breaking apart.
  2. Some experts believe NATO made mistakes that helped to spark the Ukraine war and that these mistakes are causing more issues for Europe now.
  3. There's growing concern about political violence and less freedom of speech in Germany. New political movements are also rising, which the current government does not approve of.
Global Inequality and More 3.0 • 2053 implied HN points • 11 Jan 26
  1. The war severed long-standing economic and cultural ties between Russia and Europe, hurting trade and intellectual exchange; Russia’s pivot to Asia and the Global South may blunt some of the economic pain.
  2. NATO has moved closer to Russia’s borders and Western states have frozen or seized large Russian assets, weakening Russia’s security position and national wealth.
  3. The conflict has forged a strong Ukrainian national identity and deep anti‑Russian sentiment, making genuine reconciliation unlikely for many years.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 356 implied HN points • 12 Feb 26
  1. Europe can and should defend itself without depending on the United States. Saying otherwise becomes a self-fulfilling excuse that delays needed change.
  2. Assuming the U.S. will always come to Europe’s rescue—especially under leaders who may not be committed—is dangerous and misleading; claiming helplessness can make allied support less likely and misinform citizens.
  3. Europe has the economic and demographic capacity to build credible defenses and threats like Russia are smaller than often portrayed; the real barrier is political will and a mindset among leaders unwilling to admit and fix past failures.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Glenn’s Substack • 1019 implied HN points • 02 Jul 24
  1. Ukraine's desire to join NATO is an idealistic view that ignores the reality of global power dynamics. Instead of thinking about what should be, it's important to consider how nations actually function and secure their interests.
  2. Pushing for NATO expansion in Ukraine can escalate conflict and create a cycle of tension. It suggests to Russia that NATO is a direct threat, leading to a need for military intervention.
  3. The argument that Ukraine has a right to join NATO oversimplifies a complex situation. Real peace might come from recognizing the security concerns of all parties rather than insisting on alliance expansion that could lead to further instability.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 472 implied HN points • 20 Jan 26
  1. The Greenland letter wasn’t a random tantrum but a deliberate move in a longer-term campaign to pressure Europe and push for US control of Greenland.
  2. European leaders have repeatedly flattered and conceded to him, making themselves look weak and leaving them vulnerable to unequal deals and further pressure.
  3. The Greenland drama distracts from Ukraine, undermining support and giving Russia time to attack and consolidate while global attention shifts away.
Noahpinion • 36647 implied HN points • 09 Feb 24
  1. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is deeply tied to Russia's historical rivalry with Poland and its desire to extend its influence over East Europe.
  2. Ethnic imperialism, where a country seeks to dominate a region due to linguistic and cultural similarities, is a core motivation behind Russia's actions in Ukraine.
  3. Poland's economic success and strategic autonomy pose a threat to Russia's dominance in East Europe, fueling Putin's desire to maintain control and influence in the region.
Diane Francis • 1019 implied HN points • 17 Jun 24
  1. The G7 has imposed sanctions on Russia, leading to economic troubles for them. Russians are struggling to buy dollars because of this.
  2. Ukraine is strengthening its security by signing deals with the U.S. and NATO countries, aiming to become a NATO member soon.
  3. China is benefiting from Russia's situation by buying cheap Russian oil and selling them consumer goods, making Russia more dependent on China.
imetatronink • 4324 implied HN points • 22 Dec 23
  1. Russian air defenses have demonstrated the ability to shoot down most types of strike missiles from the US/NATO.
  2. US/NATO precision-guided systems provided for Ukraine are the best they have, but not enough against Russian defenses.
  3. Pentagon must realize that conventional strike missile packages may not assure success against Russian defenses.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle • 231 implied HN points • 19 Jan 26
  1. The U.S. president publicly demanded that Denmark give Greenland to the United States, even suggesting buying or annexing the island and prompting talks framed as acquisition discussions.
  2. European allies showed symbolic military support for Denmark but avoided direct confrontation, and the U.S. threatened tariffs that led the EU to pause a trade deal, escalating tensions.
  3. Greenlanders and Danish law make a transfer unlikely, so the U.S. push risks damaging NATO unity and creating a major geopolitical dispute without local consent.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 211 implied HN points • 22 Jan 26
  1. When European states pushed back over Greenland, Trump dropped his threats and shifted toward negotiation.
  2. Concrete, coordinated European actions replaced kowtowing and gave them more leverage with the U.S.
  3. Europe should use the same assertive approach to influence U.S. policy on Ukraine and secure more reliable military support instead of appeasing the president.
imetatronink • 4618 implied HN points • 14 Aug 23
  1. The empire's proxy war in Ukraine is a lost cause, and Russia will emerge stronger from it.
  2. China, along with Russia and Iran, is rejecting the 'rules-based international order' imposed by the US.
  3. We are at a pivotal moment in history as the first global empire is in rapid decline.
imetatronink • 3262 implied HN points • 11 Dec 23
  1. Article 5 in NATO is not as effective in practice as it may seem in theory.
  2. Despite being part of NATO, many countries may not be willing or able to engage in real war situations.
  3. A potential conflict with Russia could have significant repercussions on global politics and military strength.
imetatronink • 2908 implied HN points • 24 Dec 23
  1. The article discusses the concept of 'In for a penny, in for a pound,' emphasizing finishing what was started.
  2. It critiques the idea of partitioning Ukraine between NATO and Russia as geopolitically incoherent.
  3. Putin's resolve in achieving his stated objectives in the Ukraine conflict is highlighted.
imetatronink • 4107 implied HN points • 12 Jun 23
  1. In war, the focus should be on destroying the enemy army.
  2. The acquisition and retention of territory is not the primary measure of success in war.
  3. Effective warfare can involve fighting defensively to destroy enemy forces.
Alexander News Network -Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack • 1474 implied HN points • 10 Feb 24
  1. Putin is considered to be much more intellectually capable than President Joe Biden.
  2. Putin is portrayed as having a strong love for his nation, flag, border, and history.
  3. The post questions the notion of Russia allowing Ukraine to join NATO, drawing parallels to how America would react in a similar scenario.
CDR Salamander • 1120 implied HN points • 30 Jan 24
  1. Germany is facing a security challenge due to political issues more than industry problems.
  2. Europe struggles to defend against threats with minimal naval power from major Continental European nations.
  3. The lack of military strength in Europe, particularly in Germany, poses significant challenges due to demographic shifts, political disruptions, and economic factors.
Comment is Freed • 112 implied HN points • 10 Dec 25
  1. The US National Security Strategy sides with nationalist 'Patriotic Parties' and raises alarms about demographic change, amounting to direct interference in European domestic politics.
  2. The NSS downplays Russia’s role as an aggressor in Ukraine and pushes for 'stabilising' relations and a quick peace without addressing justice, which could reward aggression and weaken European security.
  3. The document matters and must be taken seriously, but the administration is inconsistent and factional, so Europeans should judge actions over words and prepare for different possible US approaches.
Dr. Pippa's Pen & Podcast • 42 implied HN points • 21 Jan 26
  1. Greenland is suddenly a high-stakes strategic prize, with the US pushing for greater control as part of bigger security bargains, while the Inuit insist on autonomy and resent being treated like a pawn.
  2. Western unity is fraying as several European countries and Canada cozy up to China or act independently, straining NATO cohesion and intelligence sharing and worrying the US about unreliable partners.
  3. Economic and tech coercion is rising — threats of tariffs and criticism of Europe’s reliance on Chinese-made tech hint at a coming 'digital iron curtain' and increased risk of trade and technology decoupling.
Aaron Mate • 107 implied HN points • 12 Dec 25
  1. Zelensky is publicly refusing to cede the Donbas to Russia and has suggested holding a national vote or elections so Ukrainians can decide the region's fate.
  2. A Ukrainian-administered referendum would likely exclude most people who now live in Donbas because they are under Russian control, so such a vote wouldn’t capture the region’s current residents.
  3. Ukraine had earlier chances—most notably the 2015 Minsk accords—to keep Donbas inside Ukraine with limited autonomy (and forego NATO aspirations), but successive governments rejected that compromise and pursued military options instead.
Unmasking Russia • 353 implied HN points • 31 Jan 24
  1. CIA director emphasizes the importance of providing aid to Ukraine to prevent a historic mistake
  2. Russia has been secretly sending oil supplies to Europe through Turkey, bypassing sanctions
  3. EU countries are determined to pass a 50 billion euro aid package for Ukraine, even if Hungary's support is lacking
Geopolitical Economy Report • 498 implied HN points • 06 Dec 23
  1. Russia wanted a peace deal with Ukraine in March 2022, but NATO countries sabotaged it
  2. The US government prevented peace in Gaza and Ukraine by vetoing resolutions and sending weapons
  3. Multiple sources, including Germany's ex-leader and a top Ukrainian official, confirm the US role in sabotaging peace talks
Unmasking Russia • 294 implied HN points • 30 Jan 24
  1. Russian President Putin and Belarus President Lukashenko agreed to create a joint state propaganda entity.
  2. Brazilian authorities bring new money laundering charges against GRU officer linked to Russian embassy.
  3. Latvian Member of European Parliament revealed as a Russian intelligence agent, reporting to FSB.
Diane Francis • 779 implied HN points • 08 Jun 23
  1. Ukraine is using a quiet and strategic approach for their counteroffensive, making small but significant moves to weaken Russia's defenses. They're targeting various fronts, both on land and in the air, to reclaim their territory.
  2. Recent psychological operations from Ukraine aim to spread fear in Russia, including hacking broadcasts to disrupt communications and mimic official announcements. This tactic is intended to create panic among Russian citizens and disrupt military operations.
  3. Criticism of Russia's military leadership is growing, with some insiders suggesting that their troops are not effectively trained and are fleeing from battle. This unrest hints at possible future instability within Russia's political structure.
History's Parrot • 294 implied HN points • 13 Jan 24
  1. Antony Blinken is facing challenges as the Secretary of State during the decline of the Empire.
  2. Blinken's actions have ignited conflicts with countries like Russia and are worsening the situation in the Middle East.
  3. The narrative suggests that the Empire is in trouble, and Blinken's role is criticized as contributing to its demise.
TL;DRussia • 471 implied HN points • 15 Jul 23
  1. NATO was not ready to offer membership to Ukraine at the recent summit in Vilnius.
  2. Putin's focus is on maintaining power in Russia, not achieving gains abroad.
  3. Recent events with Prigozhin and military officers in Russia highlight internal tensions and dissent.
Unmasking Russia • 176 implied HN points • 09 Feb 24
  1. Ukraine is facing a critical shortage of military hardware, including missiles, and is in urgent need of support from foreign allies like the US.
  2. Lawmakers from Baltic and Nordic countries expressed concern over the lack of urgency from the US in helping Ukraine defend against Russia's invasion, warning of potential dire consequences.
  3. Recent intelligence reports suggest that Russia is rapidly rearming and may pose a threat to NATO countries within the next three to five years, prompting calls for increased military investments and sanctions by the EU.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 398 implied HN points • 26 Jan 23
  1. Germany's Foreign Minister declared that Europe is fighting a war against Russia and called for unity in sending military aid to Ukraine.
  2. The conflict in Ukraine is seen as a NATO proxy war against Russia, with evidence of involvement from various NATO members in supporting Ukraine.
  3. Some German politicians warn that the US is pushing Germany into a frontline role with limited sovereignty to prevent Eurasian integration, potentially impacting German-Russian relations.
History's Parrot • 157 implied HN points • 30 Jan 24
  1. This article discusses the war on children in Gaza and highlights the impact of violence on innocent lives.
  2. The author criticizes Canadian politicians and media for failing to denounce the genocide in Gaza and for complicity in the violence.
  3. The use of destructive bombs in Gaza is condemned as an act of barbarism, and the need to stop such atrocities is emphasized.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 418 implied HN points • 01 Jan 23
  1. The CIA, with support from a European NATO ally, is conducting sabotage attacks within Russia, including attacks on infrastructure like railways, bridges, and military facilities.
  2. Evidence suggests the CIA has been involved in a proxy war in Ukraine, providing training and military support to Ukrainian forces since 2015.
  3. There's a risk of the proxy war escalating into a direct conflict between the US and Russia, with potential for serious consequences.
Unmasking Russia • 137 implied HN points • 12 Feb 24
  1. Trump's alarming rhetoric towards NATO raises concerns about the future of transatlantic security if he were to win the election.
  2. The need to address foreign interference in democratic institutions becomes urgent with Trump's willingness to align with Putin and seek assistance in the upcoming election.
  3. Trump's criticism of allies and questioning of NATO's value highlight the uncertainty of U.S. foreign policy and its implications for international stability.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 144 implied HN points • 03 Jul 25
  1. NATO's new defense spending pledge may distract from what really matters: actually improving military capabilities. It's important for countries to focus on building effective defense systems rather than just meeting spending targets.
  2. European nations need to work together and make smart investments in defense rather than buying the same equipment individually. Coordinated efforts can lead to better outcomes and more efficient use of resources.
  3. The EU is increasingly supporting Ukraine, treating it like a member state in defense matters. This shows a shift in European responsibilities and a growing focus on autonomy in defense capabilities.
Geopolitical Economy Report • 338 implied HN points • 26 Nov 22
  1. Germany is preparing for a potential war with Russia by boosting its military budget and planning to become the world's third-biggest military spender.
  2. The re-militarization of Germany involves bipartisan support, with both the current government and opposition contributing to a €100 billion 'special defense fund.'
  3. Germany has increased its military presence in NATO, deploying troops in Lithuania and participating in military exercises, aligning with the escalating tensions in the proxy war with Russia.
Points And Figures • 746 implied HN points • 11 Feb 24
  1. The Tucker Carlson interview with Putin didn't break new ground, but generated views and highlighted the power of Twitter for news.
  2. Putin's incorrect historical claims were discussed, shedding light on the importance of transparent cost/benefit analyses in foreign policy decisions.
  3. Various political dynamics and implications surrounding the Ukraine situation, including corruption, global power struggles, and potential military actions, were analyzed.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 23 implied HN points • 23 Nov 25
  1. The draft peace is actually a capitulation that would force Ukraine to cede territory, demilitarize, and forego NATO membership, giving Russia the time and space to rebuild its military.
  2. Because Russia has repeatedly broken agreements, rewarding it with recognition, sanctions relief, and economic reintegration would likely embolden further aggression across Europe and beyond.
  3. Implementing this plan would destroy U.S. credibility and split its allies, making future large-scale conflicts — possibly involving Americans and even nuclear risks — far more likely, and domestic political indifference makes that outcome easier to achieve.