The hottest Civil Rights Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

A Mom Asked for Public School Board Records. They Charged Her $33 Million.

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 3426 implied HN points • 18 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Education Transparency Public Policy Legal issues Civil Rights
  1. Parents are increasingly suing schools to find out what their children are learning. This shows a demand for transparency in education.
  2. Some schools are responding by suing parents to silence them. This creates a conflict between parents' rights to know and schools' desire to keep information private.
  3. A mom was quoted a shocking amount of over $33 million to access public school records. This highlights how expensive and complicated it can be to get information from schools.

Israel Is Killing Civilians In Gaza On Purpose, And It's Not Even Debatable

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2468 implied HN points • 27 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Civil Rights Military Action Media Critique Public Opinion
  1. The actions of the Israeli military in Gaza have been confirmed to be deliberately targeting civilians. Many reports and testimonies highlight that civilian casualties are not accidental.
  2. The narrative used to justify these actions, like claiming civilians are human shields, has been discredited. There's a growing insistence that denying this reality is increasingly difficult.
  3. Society’s beliefs about power and inequality are shaped by stories that benefit those in control. It's possible to change this dynamic if enough people decide to take action against the current system.

Ban Masking Now

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1734 implied HN points • 06 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legislation Crime Public Safety Civil Rights Protests
  1. There's a call to reinstate anti-masking laws because masks can help criminals hide their identity. This relates to incidents of violence in cities like New York and concerns about safety.
  2. The repeal of the anti-masking law has reportedly led to more crime and intimidation, especially against specific groups on college campuses. This highlights the negative impact of masking in certain contexts.
  3. Some believe that banning masks during protests and other public events can help prevent crimes and maintain safety, similar to historical laws that targeted groups like the KKK. The debate continues on whether such measures would be effective today.

A Q&A with immigration attorneys on the ground

The Watch • 373 implied HN points • 08 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Climate Civil Rights
  1. Immigration policies are becoming stricter and changing rapidly, which causes fear within communities. People are worried about raids happening in areas like schools and hospitals.
  2. Lawyers for immigrants are noticing that most deportations are still targeting people who are easy to remove rather than dangerous criminals. This means many law-abiding people could be caught up in the system.
  3. There is a growing culture of fear surrounding immigration enforcement. Events meant to educate people about their rights are being canceled or avoided because activists fear they could put people at risk of being detained.

It’s Time for the Government to Abolish ‘Race’

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 4219 implied HN points • 03 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Race Issues Government Policy Civil Rights Identity politics
  1. The government has been categorizing people into limited racial groups since 1977, which critics argue is outdated and arbitrary.
  2. Changes to these categories are coming, with the 2030 census set to have seven defined races instead of five, but these classifications are still seen as confusing and nonsensical.
  3. Some people believe that instead of having these set racial categories, the concept of race should be completely abolished in government practices.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

‘Globalize the Intifada’ Comes to New Orleans

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1595 implied HN points • 06 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Terrorism Public Safety Civil Rights Media Criticism Political Commentary
  1. A recent attack in New Orleans involved a terrorist act that killed multiple people and showed how global trends of violence can impact local communities.
  2. Witnesses reported seeing an ISIS flag with the attacker, highlighting the connection between local violence and international extremists.
  3. A corporate leader responded to the tragedy by talking about positivity and acceptance, which some found inappropriate given the severity of the situation.

Things are going even worse than I expected

The Future, Now and Then • 345 implied HN points • 02 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Elections Regulation Political theory Civil Rights
  1. Elon Musk has taken significant control over the U.S. government, causing concern among observers. His style of leadership resembles how he managed Twitter, which raises questions about legality and governance.
  2. The ability to rebuild and enforce government regulations takes time, and the current situation is making it harder for progressives to succeed. There’s a sense of lost potential for positive change.
  3. Many people feel a sense of mourning for the futures that now seem impossible. Plans and hopes for progress that once existed are now gone, and it leaves a feeling of disappointment.

Mr. President, Don’t Abandon the Rule of Law to Save TikTok

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 700 implied HN points • 20 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law Government Civil Rights Elections Public Policy
  1. The rule of law is important in a republic and should not be ignored, even for popular apps like TikTok.
  2. As president, there is a responsibility to uphold the law rather than make exceptions for personal preferences.
  3. Supporting independent journalism is essential for shedding light on important issues and maintaining accountability.

Daniel Penny’s Innocence—and the Shame of Alvin Bragg. Plus. . .

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 2610 implied HN points • 10 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Justice System Political Commentary Civil Rights Government Policy
  1. Daniel Penny was found not guilty in a high-profile trial, raising questions about why he was prosecuted in the first place. The verdict was seen as a relief for Penny and his supporters.
  2. There is concern over rising crime rates in Manhattan during Alvin Bragg's time as district attorney. Critics argue that his decisions have not effectively protected the public.
  3. Entrepreneurs are leaving Norway due to high taxes on unrealized gains. This has been detrimental to business growth and has prompted some to move to more favorable locations.

Happy Despot's Day

Daniel Pinchbeck’s Newsletter • 16 implied HN points • 17 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Ideologies Public Policy Civil Rights Government Agencies
  1. Hate and division are increasingly visible in society, with some public figures openly embracing extremist ideologies. It's concerning to see how these harmful beliefs are being normalized.
  2. Fascism promotes control and hate rather than community and cooperation. This ideology can damage individuals and society as a whole, pushing people to project their pain onto others.
  3. The rise of hateful rhetoric has pushed previously hidden prejudices into public view. This indicates a collective struggle with guilt and shame about societal injustices, making it hard to understand how we got here.

Daniel Penny’s Innocence—and the Shame of Alvin Bragg

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 2406 implied HN points • 10 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law Justice Prosecution Public Opinion Civil Rights
  1. Daniel Penny was found not guilty, which some believe highlights the wrongful prosecution against him. People felt he was trying to protect others on the subway when he acted.
  2. The district attorney, Alvin Bragg, faced criticism for how he handled the case, implying that his approach was unethical and manipulative.
  3. There were serious concerns about the intent behind Penny's actions and whether his restraint actually caused the death, leading to questions about the justification for the charges against him.

God Save Us

Disaffected Newsletter • 2877 implied HN points • 13 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Civil Rights Social Issues Conflict
  1. Some people are very concerned about the actions and beliefs of those on the left, feeling that they pose a real threat. It’s important to be aware and cautious about who you trust among friends and family.
  2. There is a belief that the situation could escalate to serious conflict, possibly a civil war, and some are preparing to defend themselves. Being ready is viewed as a priority by some.
  3. It’s suggested to put distance between yourself and those who hold opposing views, as they might not have your best interests at heart. Staying safe means creating boundaries with certain people.

Finding the devil in legislative details

Disaffected Newsletter • 1518 implied HN points • 09 Aug 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legislation Policy Advocacy Governance Civil Rights
  1. Legislative language can be complicated and confusing, making it hard for everyday people to understand what laws really mean. It's important to break down legal terms into simple language so everyone can grasp their implications.
  2. Some laws might have hidden meanings that could cause major issues, like how definitions in legislation can change the way we understand terms like 'sexual orientation.' This can lead to unintended consequences that affect society.
  3. Activists sometimes downplay the real effects of laws, which can be alarming. It's crucial to stay informed and critically assess what legislation truly entails to protect the rights and safety of all individuals.

'First Blood,' Individual Rights, and the Subversion of the Law

The Take (by Jon Miltimore) • 337 implied HN points • 05 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law enforcement Civil Rights Police Reform Social justice Crime Prevention
  1. The film 'First Blood' shows how misinterpretations of the law can lead to violence. It highlights that police encounters aimed at enforcing minor laws can escalate badly.
  2. Rambo's experience reminds us that police are people who can make mistakes. This stresses the idea that policing should focus on real crimes rather than petty behaviors.
  3. When the law is used to infringe on individual rights, it loses its true purpose. The film teaches us to question the role of police in everyday situations.

OSD 312: Do you remember how hyped you were to buy your first gun?

Open Source Defense • 59 implied HN points • 11 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Regulation Civil Rights Legal issues Public Policy
  1. Buying your first gun feels like a big deal, especially if you've never had one before. It's exciting and can feel like a major life choice.
  2. For many people, modern gun culture is still new and unknown. There are many opportunities to introduce them to this world.
  3. The future of gun culture and tech is bright. As more people get involved, there will be many amazing and innovative things created in the coming years.

A Declaration of Revival and Redemption

Journal of Free Black Thought • 54 implied HN points • 07 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Civil Rights Family Values Education & Policy Community Initiatives
  1. There is a call to restore the traditional two-parent family structure in the Black community. This shift is seen as crucial for improving the overall wellbeing of children and families.
  2. The education system is a focus for change, emphasizing the need for school choice and vocational training to better prepare students for success.
  3. The movement advocates for a return to Christian values and community support for initiatives that strengthen families and provide quality education.

A Chicago judge just erased her predecessor's historic ruling on forensic firearms analysis

The Watch • 726 implied HN points • 14 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judicial system Criminal Justice Legal Reform Civil Rights
  1. A judge in Chicago recently overturned a significant ruling that questioned the reliability of forensic firearms analysis. This ruling had previously stopped prosecutors from presenting certain expert testimony in court.
  2. Forensic firearms analysis lacks strong scientific backing, and there's little evidence showing that analysts can accurately match bullets to guns. This raises doubts about its validity as a reliable tool in criminal cases.
  3. The legal system often prefers to maintain the status quo, which can prevent important scientific critiques from being heard. This means flawed methods can remain in use, making it hard to achieve true justice for those accused.

Thoughts on Trump Ending Affirmative Action in Contracting

Richard Hanania's Newsletter • 4925 implied HN points • 22 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Policy Analysis Political theory Civil Rights Political Activism Government regulations
  1. It's possible to change policy even if you aren't famous or super connected. By bringing important issues to people's attention and making a strong argument, you can influence the conversation around those policies.
  2. Timing is key in politics. Being vocal about an issue when it matters most can lead to real changes. If people are focused on something important, it's a good time to suggest new ideas.
  3. Conservatives have started realizing the need to fight against 'wokeness' and its influence in government and business. The recent action to end certain affirmative action policies shows a significant shift in their approach.

In The Fight Against Tyranny, Don't Let Your Happiness Depend On Big Wins

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2184 implied HN points • 26 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Civil Rights Activism Government Social Issues Mental health Philosophy
  1. It's important to find happiness outside of big victories. Relying on large wins can lead to disappointment and frustration.
  2. Your happiness can positively impact others. Allowing joy into your life can spread happiness to those around you.
  3. Cultivating happiness is a valuable skill. Learning to be happy can make you more effective in your efforts to make a difference.

Did Google, Facebook, and Amazon Endorse Jim Crow?

BIG by Matt Stoller • 25210 implied HN points • 02 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Monopoly Antitrust Regulation Civil Rights First Amendment
  1. The Supreme Court is currently considering a case involving tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon and the question of whether economic regulations for these platforms are unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
  2. The case has broad societal implications, touching on antitrust, privacy, civil rights, and speech liability claims against big tech firms. The argument raised questions about the extent of tech companies' rights to make decisions like racial segregation or account deletions based on political views.
  3. The case illustrates how the influence of Robert Bork, a conservative antitrust lawyer, has shaped modern American corporate state, particularly the broad support for a society run by big tech, challenging the traditional role of democratically elected officials in regulating private tech platforms.

In The Jan 6 Killing Of Ashli Babbitt, A Double-Standard On Cop Misconduct

Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey • 595 implied HN points • 02 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law enforcement Public Safety Political Rhetoric Civil Rights Media influence
  1. There seems to be a double standard in how people react to police shootings based on their political beliefs. Some cheer for officers who harm certain individuals while condemning others under similar circumstances.
  2. The use of lethal force by police should only occur if there is a clear and imminent threat. In Ashli Babbitt's case, many argue there wasn't a justifiable reason for the officer to shoot her.
  3. Past behavior of police officers can raise concerns about their decision-making, especially when they've had issues with gun safety before. This highlights the need for accountability in law enforcement.

Life in The Age of Moral Panics

OK Doomer • 129 implied HN points • 12 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political History Social Issues Civil Rights Government Power Public Discourse
  1. Moral panics often happen in society, where people blame others for their problems. This can lead to targeting vulnerable groups instead of addressing real issues.
  2. History shows that powerful people use scapegoats to distract the public from bigger problems. This tactic has been around for a long time, similar to the witch hunts in the past.
  3. The patterns of moral panic are still present today, and they show that society hasn't really changed. Instead of learning from history, we seem to repeat the same mistakes.

The Free Speech Union of Canada

Critical Mass • 24 implied HN points • 18 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Free speech Legislation Governance Civil Rights Activism
  1. The Free Speech Union of Canada has launched to protect and promote free speech rights in Canada. It aims to help people understand their rights and offer support for anyone facing issues.
  2. There is concern about proposed laws, like the Online Harms Act, that could limit free speech by allowing the government to shut down social media access based on accusations of hate speech. This could unfairly silence people.
  3. The union will lobby against anti-free speech legislation and provide resources for members, including legal representation if needed. The ultimate goal is to make the organization unnecessary by restoring and maintaining free speech rights.

Across the Divide: What It Means to Be American

Papyrus Rampant • 138 implied HN points • 12 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Identity Political division Historical Narratives Civic engagement Civil Rights
  1. People often have different views of history based on their experiences and backgrounds. This can lead to disagreements over what events mean and how they shape our identities.
  2. National stories are important because they give people a sense of belonging. These narratives help define what it means to be part of a nation and influence how people understand each other.
  3. It's okay to disagree, but we need to learn to accept our differences without hostility. True connection comes from love and understanding, even across political divides.

Trump's DeWokification of America has Begun

Unsafe Science • 259 implied HN points • 24 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Policy Changes Political strategy Civil Rights Diversity Issues Trump administration
  1. There's a big push to remove DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs from the federal government. This is seen as a reaction to how these programs have been viewed by some as unfair.
  2. Many people believe that DEI efforts have made certain groups feel alienated. This includes people who see these policies as discriminating against them.
  3. The new executive order doesn't ban all DEI efforts, but it does make sure federal money won't support them unless they comply with anti-discrimination laws.

The National Science Foundation and the fine line between anti-discrimination and flat-out racism

Heterodox STEM • 249 implied HN points • 26 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Civil Rights Diversity Government Policy Legal issues Social justice
  1. The National Science Foundation's GOLD program was created to boost diversity in geosciences but has faced criticism for possibly promoting discrimination instead of true inclusion.
  2. There have been incidents where events limited participation based on race, raising legal concerns about civil rights violations under federal law.
  3. Many diversity initiatives funded by the government need better oversight to ensure they don't violate civil rights, and it’s important for people to report any discrimination they encounter.

Transcript - America This Week, December 06, 2024: "The Immaculate Pardon"

TK News by Matt Taibbi • 1368 implied HN points • 07 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Legislation Political Commentary Public Opinion Civil Rights
  1. Pardons are a hot topic right now, especially after Joe Biden pardoned his son. Many people are questioning the fairness and implications of such pardons.
  2. There's a feeling that some media figures are only now criticizing the Democrats after being quiet for years. This shift feels a bit like they’re deserting a sinking ship.
  3. Jon Stewart and others who criticize the current political landscape might not have faced the same backlash that others, like Taibbi and Kirn, experienced. It raises questions about their credibility in the current discourse.

Oh No, Now The US Will Have A President Who Does Bad Things

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2323 implied HN points • 07 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Analysis Political Commentary Party Politics Civil Rights
  1. Democrats often seem to ignore the harm they've caused, focusing on fears of future bad leadership instead. They have a history of inaction while criticizing others.
  2. There's a belief that both political parties are more similar than they let on. Both sides cater to the wealthy and powerful, keeping the status quo intact.
  3. People on the left may express more genuine concerns about morality, while others seem to care more about their image than taking a stand against wrongdoing.

This Super Bowl, Snoop Dog & Tom Brady Will Defend The Ethnic Cleansing of Gaza

JoeWrote • 189 implied HN points • 06 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Propaganda Media Civil Rights Foreign Policy Israel-Palestine
  1. Snoop Dog and Tom Brady will be seen in a Super Bowl ad that promotes standing up against hate. However, the underlying message is seen as supporting controversial views related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  2. The Foundation to Combat Antisemitism, behind the ad, is accused of misusing the fight against hate to silence criticism of Israel. Critics believe it manipulates social justice themes to push a political agenda.
  3. Concerns are raised about how alleged antisemitism is measured and reported by FCAS, suggesting their methods might mislead the public. The focus on antisemitism may overshadow awareness of the struggles faced by Palestinians.

Gulag For You

Points And Figures • 959 implied HN points • 24 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Corruption Law enforcement Government Accountability Civil Rights Political Commentary
  1. Corruption in Illinois is rampant, especially within its government and judicial systems. Many residents feel they can't get a fair trial due to biased and corrupt officials.
  2. The case of Steve Fanady shows how the judicial system can mistreat individuals, holding them indefinitely while ignoring their rights. His situation raises concerns about the motivations behind such actions.
  3. Many believe that political leaders prioritize their power and financial interests over the welfare of citizens. This has led to calls for better investigative journalism to expose and address these corrupt practices.

How the Sall Grover event went in Christchurch NZ, and how the audience that questions gender ideology has changed in three years.

A B’Old Woman • 1458 implied HN points • 11 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Gender Issues Civil Rights Activism Public Policy Women's Rights
  1. Sall Grover's event in Christchurch showed a growing audience that is concerned about gender ideology. People are more aware and ready to take action compared to a similar gathering three years ago.
  2. There has been a noticeable change in attitudes towards gender issues, with attendees at Grover's event feeling frustrated and motivated to fight against gender self-identification practices. The need for clarity and support in women's rights has become a pressing issue.
  3. Different groups are willing to set aside their differences to focus on key goals, like protecting single-sex spaces for women and safeguarding children from harmful gender ideology. There’s a sense of determination to work together for these objectives.

Legal Plunder: Indiana Police Prey On Packages Transiting Huge FedEx Hub

Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey • 1095 implied HN points • 29 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law enforcement Civil Rights Government Overreach Justice System
  1. Civil asset forfeiture allows police to seize money and property without charging the owner with a crime. This practice raises serious questions about fairness and the presumption of innocence.
  2. In Indianapolis, police are seizing cash from FedEx packages based on vague criteria, leading to many innocent individuals losing their money without any proof of wrongdoing.
  3. Victims of these seizures often struggle to get their property back and feel hopeless navigating the complex legal system. A class action lawsuit is now trying to stop this predatory practice.

What Is a Constitution?

God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 70 implied HN points • 28 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitution Government Legal system Civil Rights Political theory
  1. The American Constitution has changed three major times, usually during crises, to fix problems with the earlier versions.
  2. The current Constitution has strayed far from what was originally agreed upon, indicating that we might need a new one soon.
  3. Many rights and protections in the Constitution have been weakened or ignored, showing a shift in how they are applied today.

Jan. 6 and the path not taken

Can We Still Govern? • 399 implied HN points • 06 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Democracy Leadership Political parties Elections Civil Rights
  1. Republican leaders failed to act against Trump after the January 6 event, which allowed him to regain power and continue his influence. They prioritized their own political goals over protecting democracy.
  2. Many Americans have moved from viewing the January 6 attack as a threat to democracy to seeing it as a sign of loyalty to Trump. This shift shows how quickly narratives can change in politics.
  3. In contrast to other countries, where leaders who challenged democracy faced consequences, the U.S. is seeing Trump and his allies returning to power without accountability for their actions. This raises concerns about the future of American democracy.

READING: Martin Luther King, Jr. (1958): Out of the Long Night

Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality • 192 implied HN points • 20 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Civil Rights Social justice Race relations Historical context
  1. Nonviolent resistance is a powerful way to fight for justice. It focuses on love and understanding instead of anger and violence.
  2. The struggle for freedom and equality will keep going until everyone is free. People who face injustice have a strong desire to fight for their rights.
  3. It's important for everyone, especially churches, to stand against racism and inequality. Many people stay quiet, and that can be just as harmful.

Democrats Weaponized FBI To Falsely Claim White Supremacists Posed Greater Terror Threat Than Radical Islamists

Public • 528 implied HN points • 02 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political violence Terrorism Government oversight Civil Rights Public Policy
  1. The FBI has claimed that white supremacists are the biggest terrorism threat, but this claim lacks solid evidence. Many believe that radical Islamist violence is actually a bigger concern.
  2. A recent terrorist attack in New Orleans was carried out by someone motivated by radical Islamic beliefs. This incident contradicts the FBI's focus on white supremacy as the main threat.
  3. The government agencies, including the FBI and DHS, have consistently highlighted white supremacist violence, raising questions about their motives and the accuracy of their assessments.

Police Use of DNA to Create a Suspect’s Face Is Dangerous Junk Science & Why Aren't More Black People Voting?

kareem • 6151 implied HN points • 06 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Civil Rights Justice System Political Activism Historical Events
  1. Be cautious of the dangerous junk science involved in using DNA to predict a suspect's face and running facial recognition on it.
  2. Black History Month is crucial to celebrate the contributions of Black individuals that have been historically overlooked and ignored.
  3. Efforts to restrict Black voting rights are a serious issue, with people of color being underrepresented in the electorate despite making up a significant portion of eligible voters.