The hottest Supreme Court Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Striking 13 3014 implied HN points 17 Nov 23
  1. The government in Rwanda is attempting to implement controversial policies, but they are facing significant challenges and obstacles at every step.
  2. The plan for dealing with asylum seekers is chaotic and unrealistic, resulting in confusion and uncertainty for all parties involved, including potential legal consequences.
  3. There are complex legal, constitutional, and parliamentary hurdles that the government needs to overcome in order to push through their proposed legislation, indicating a tough road ahead if they intend to proceed.
AND Magazine 1808 implied HN points 25 Jan 24
  1. The crisis regarding access to the Texas-Mexican border has escalated into a direct confrontation between Washington and Austin.
  2. The federal government must operate within the limits set by the Constitution and for the benefit of American citizens, which seems to be disregarded in the current situation.
  3. Texas has chosen to defy what it views as blatantly unconstitutional orders by the President and the Supreme Court.
TK News by Matt Taibbi 5328 implied HN points 08 Feb 24
  1. The Supreme Court is reviewing Colorado's decision to remove Donald Trump from the ballot, drawing attention from the press.
  2. There are delusions and strong opinions surrounding Trump's response and the impact it may have on society, as reflected in media coverage.
  3. The case about Trump's ballot access is a topic of discussion and analysis in current news.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Persuasion 2358 implied HN points 30 Jun 23
  1. The end of affirmative action could lead to a crucial change in the flawed admissions system.
  2. Elite colleges might exploit loopholes to maintain unjust practices like legacy admissions, donor preferences, and subjective personal statements.
  3. The personal statement component of admissions can perpetuate privilege, as it is subjective and prone to manipulation, undermining the fairness of the system.
Glenn’s Substack 2260 implied HN points 29 Jun 23
  1. The Supreme Court ruling against Harvard and UNC impacts diversity and affirmative action practices in higher education.
  2. The Court previously deferred to universities on the compelling interest of diversity, but now requires limits within the constitution.
  3. Higher education's declining reputation may lead to less favorable treatment in the judiciary system.
Glenn Loury 3551 implied HN points 18 Jun 23
  1. The Supreme Court is expected to end racial preferences in college admissions, but the fight for racial equality will continue.
  2. Advocates suggest shifting preferences from race to socioeconomics to better address disparities in access to education.
  3. Maintaining racial preferences based on outdated assumptions about disadvantages faced by black students may actually hinder progress towards equality.
COVID Reason 3132 implied HN points 18 May 23
  1. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch speaks out against lockdowns and mandates, highlighting the erosion of civil liberties during the Covid era.
  2. Gorsuch consistently defended the Constitution and challenged Covid restrictions on religious liberty.
  3. Gorsuch's opinions underscore the need to balance public health concerns with protecting individual freedoms and the importance of robust debate in decision-making.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 499 implied HN points 28 Mar 24
  1. Plaintiffs in the case lack standing, which weakens their argument. They need to show personal harm, not just philosophical opposition.
  2. Even if plaintiffs had standing, their claims fail on the merits. The FDA's decisions were well-reasoned and based on evidence, debunking plaintiffs' objections.
  3. Banning mifepristone won't help the plaintiff-doctors study it; rather, it will hinder data collection. The FDA's evaluation of studies appears rational and reasonable.
Glenn’s Substack 1513 implied HN points 02 Jun 23
  1. The Supreme Court's decision in New York Times v. Sullivan constitutionalized the law of libel.
  2. The case highlighted the importance of the 'actual malice' standard in libel cases, requiring proof of knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth.
  3. The Sullivan case had a significant impact by protecting the press from libel suits, but also raised concerns about media responsibility and trust over time.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 239 implied HN points 29 May 24
  1. The South Carolina redistricting case was decided 6 to 3, with a majority opinion written by Republican-appointed Justices and a dissent by Democratic-appointed Justices, showing a split along party lines.
  2. The decision-making in cases like _Alexander_ and _Cromartie II_ was influenced by the broader legal context surrounding partisan and racial gerrymandering issues, leading to close calls among the Justices.
  3. Judges tend to apply their ideological views to non-ideological issues when those issues are close, as seen in the standing decisions related to ideological issues in cases like the student loan disputes and _Alexander_.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 239 implied HN points 13 May 24
  1. In judicial decision-making, applying precedent like a robot can lead to simple and predictable case resolutions.
  2. Civil asset forfeiture cases can be complex, leading to unfair outcomes for innocent owners, with issues such as timing, burden of proof, and lack of initial judicial oversight.
  3. While some judges have specific judicial philosophies, there is an argument for mindlessly applying precedent to simplify and predict case outcomes, potentially reducing division and making the judicial process less dependent on individual justices.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 698 implied HN points 09 Jan 24
  1. The Constitution does not require states to include currently ineligible candidates on the ballot, even if they may become eligible in the future.
  2. Allowing ineligible candidates on the ballot can lead to confusion for voters and cause controversy if an ineligible candidate wins the election.
  3. Interpreting the Constitution requires sticking to the text rather than overly creative lawyering to avoid confusion and promote understanding among citizens.
SHERO 648 implied HN points 17 Jan 24
  1. A Trump-appointed judge's ruling in Texas allows more states to join a lawsuit against restrictions on the abortion pill Mifepristone.
  2. The Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal to preserve broad access to the Mifepristone abortion pill, delaying potential restrictions.
  3. The legal battle surrounding Mifepristone highlights the impact of standing in court cases and raises questions about judicial legitimacy.
Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey 1999 implied HN points 15 Jan 24
  1. The intensity of the division in American politics arises from the federal government operating beyond the limits of the Constitution.
  2. The federal government's involvement in various aspects of American life is mostly unconstitutional based on the limited powers granted by the Constitution.
  3. The Supreme Court has played a significant role in expanding federal powers through broad interpretations of clauses like the General Welfare and Commerce clauses.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 659 implied HN points 21 Dec 23
  1. Chances of the Supreme Court disqualifying Trump are low but improving, now estimated at around 20%.
  2. The conventional wisdom leans towards the Supreme Court reversing the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, considering factors like democratic norms and legal arguments.
  3. There is a small chance, about 15%, that the Supreme Court might affirm the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to disqualify Trump, based on the quality of legal reasoning in the case.
The Popehat Report 3630 implied HN points 27 Apr 23
  1. American society is diverse and faces challenges in applying legal standards like the reasonable person test across different cultures.
  2. Cultural context plays a significant role in determining what constitutes a true threat in First Amendment cases.
  3. To strike a balance between free speech and protection from threats, considering the intended audience's cultural context in true threats analysis could be a valuable approach.
A Lawyer Writes 530 implied HN points 09 Jan 24
  1. The Supreme Court was ruling on cases involving psychiatric injury from clinical negligence involving close relatives
  2. Historically, court rulings have shaped the law on negligence and compensation for secondary victims of medical errors
  3. The recent Supreme Court decision clarified that doctors do not owe a duty of care to close family members for illness caused by witnessing a relative's death due to medical negligence
SHERO 412 implied HN points 25 Jan 24
  1. Texas Governor Greg Abbott refuses to remove razor wire at the US-Mexico border despite Supreme Court ruling
  2. Conservative Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had previously blocked the federal government from removing the razor wire initially set up by National Guard soldiers
  3. Supreme Court ruling in favor of federal government was a major victory for the Biden administration
Adam's Legal Newsletter 359 implied HN points 06 Feb 24
  1. The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, vacated an injunction that restricted the Border Patrol from cutting a fence near the Rio Grande. Governor Abbott disagreed with the decision, claiming Texas's constitutional authority above federal statutes.
  2. Texas put up concertina wire fences near the border to stop illegal immigration, leading to clashes with Border Patrol officials who cut the fences. Issues arose as to whether cutting the fence was justified in enforcing federal immigration law.
  3. The Fifth Circuit granted an injunction to Texas to stop the cutting of the fence, but the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, vacated this injunction without providing any explanation, sparking disagreement and criticism.
Bad News 668 implied HN points 04 Apr 23
  1. Wisconsin state Supreme Court race could have major impact on abortion rights, future control of House, and 2024 presidential election.
  2. Conservatives currently hold a 4-3 majority on the Wisconsin state Supreme Court.
  3. Chicago mayoral election features a progressive candidate facing an eccentric conservative, with significant implications for working class Black voters and progressive movement.
The New Urban Order 179 implied HN points 15 Apr 24
  1. The U.S. Supreme Court will decide on whether homelessness can be considered a crime, impacting how cities handle homeless individuals.
  2. Many cities fail to provide the necessary housing and services to keep people off the streets, leading to homelessness being criminalized.
  3. Jailing homeless individuals further exacerbates their situation, making it harder for them to transition out of homelessness.
TK News by Matt Taibbi 1236 implied HN points 27 Jan 24
  1. The Supreme Court allowed border control agents to remove razor wire Texas installed at the Mexico border due to obstruction issues.
  2. The story only pertains to the specific technique of using razor wire at the border and not Texas' broader efforts to secure it.
  3. The Biden administration argued that the razor wire hindered agents' duties, making it harder to enforce the law and control irregular migration.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 619 implied HN points 03 Sep 23
  1. There is a 10% chance that the Supreme Court finds Trump ineligible for the Presidency under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  2. Legal challenges to Trump's eligibility would have to navigate multiple obstacles, including Supreme Court acceptance and factual interpretation of the insurrection on January 6, 2021.
  3. The legal argument that the 1872 and 1898 Amnesty Acts remove Section Three's prohibition may present a significant threshold objection to Trump's disqualification.
SHERO 589 implied HN points 28 Jun 23
  1. The recent Supreme Court rulings show the conservative majority pushing a political agenda that undermines civil rights.
  2. The Court's refusal to set limits on state courts reviewing certain election issues highlights the importance of the Supremacy Clause over state laws.
  3. While some recent Court decisions may seem reasonable, they could be more about self-protection for the justices than genuine jurisprudence.
OLD GOATS with Jonathan Alter 569 implied HN points 27 May 23
  1. Hillary Clinton remains optimistic while acknowledging worries about the current state of the world
  2. Analysis of Trump's influence and tactics in politics, his impact on the Republican Party, and the importance of truth in democracy
  3. Reflection on women's empowerment, political engagement, and the challenges of perfectionism in today's society
Breaking the News 1603 implied HN points 29 Jul 23
  1. James Fallows prefers not to sign up with Threads due to reasons like ownership concerns, user interface preferences, and lack of critical mass in comparison to other platforms.
  2. James Fallows prefers not to write further about the 'Lab Leak', citing coverage by David Quammen in the New York Times Magazine on Covid's origin mysteries and the importance of the origin question.
  3. James Fallows prefers not to write about where the economy is headed or media coverage related to the economy at this time.
Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality 176 implied HN points 25 Nov 24
  1. The Federal Reserve's role and its constitutionality are often misunderstood, especially by some Republicans. They argue that it shouldn't have the power to manage money since only Congress can do that.
  2. The creation of money has evolved, and while paper money existed, it was not the same as coins issued by the government. Now, Federal Reserve Notes are more like promises from banks rather than actual money made by Congress.
  3. There are concerns that the current Supreme Court may not interpret the Constitution properly regarding these financial matters, as it is seen as being influenced by political agendas rather than legal principles.