David Friedmanās Substack ⢠350 implied HN points ⢠26 Dec 25
- The usual claim that the death penalty is uniquely irreversible is weaker than it sounds because many wrongful convictions are never discovered, and in narrow tradeoffs execution could be justified if it genuinely prevented more innocent deaths.
- Making executions cheap creates a moral hazard: when decisionāmakers bear little cost but impose the ultimate cost on others, they are likelier to make lethally bad decisions, so deliberately inefficient (costly) punishments can protect against abuse.
- The historical militia argument for widespread private guns made sense in the eighteenth century but is weaker today; modern checks on governmental power may depend more on control of information, though private arms can still deter crime and limit expansions of police power, leaving the empirical question open.