Bet On It ⢠196 implied HN points ⢠22 Jan 26
- A wide-ranging, original case that free markets deserve stronger defense and often produce better outcomes than government alternatives.
- Many popular government policies sound appealing but often do real harm, and most market failures trace back to human irrationality rather than fundamental flaws in markets.
- The argument confronts mainstream assumptions and offers bold policy challengesâlike revisiting Friedman's abolition ideas and accounting for social-desirability biasâto persuade unconvinced skeptics.