The hottest Censorship Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 182 implied HN points 09 Jan 25
  1. Mark Zuckerberg announced a shift in Facebook's content policies, saying he wants to focus on free expression and simplify rules. He plans to phase out fact-checkers and bring back more political content.
  2. Some European leaders are expressing strong concerns about this approach, fearing it might lead to more dangerous speech online. They worry that American social media giants might undermine rules in Europe.
  3. There's a growing tension between American social media companies and European regulations, which could lead to major changes in how the internet operates in those regions.
The Chris Hedges Report 302 implied HN points 10 Dec 24
  1. Poetry can hold immense power, serving as a way to express emotions like hope, loss, and resistance against oppression. It connects people and keeps their stories alive.
  2. Many individuals, including students, journalists, and academics, are facing serious consequences, such as losing jobs or being silenced, for speaking out against injustice and violence.
  3. Remembering the stories of those who have suffered, like Palestinian poet Refaat Alareer, is crucial. Their voices continue to resonate and challenge the narrative imposed by oppressive forces.
Michael Shellenberger 1354 implied HN points 19 Dec 24
  1. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) might have illegally targeted people who disagreed with COVID-19 policies by pushing social media to censor certain opinions.
  2. New documents suggest that DHS started monitoring COVID-related speech as early as February 2020, raising concerns about overstepping its legal boundaries.
  3. This surveillance and censorship might violate laws that restrict government agencies from involving themselves in issues without clear permission from Congress.
Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way 4166 implied HN points 04 Dec 23
  1. Liberal journalists have released new allegations regarding the origins of the censorship-industrial complex.
  2. Olivia Troye was involved in debunking the whistleblower's story about U.S. government censorship.
  3. Troye was fired from the Trump Administration and is considered a 'useful idiot' of the national security state.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
The Dossier 339 implied HN points 27 Nov 24
  1. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a key figure in advocating for more sensible COVID-related policies, taking personal risks in his professional life to voice his beliefs.
  2. He has been instrumental in challenging the heavy censorship surrounding opinions that go against popular narratives about the pandemic.
  3. Bhattacharya's courage and qualifications make him a strong leader in efforts to improve public health and address the mistakes made during the pandemic.
Human Flourishing 2122 implied HN points 08 Feb 24
  1. Governments throughout history have tried to control speech and communication channels.
  2. Technological advancements have made censorship more personal and affect the tools we use every day.
  3. The outcome of Missouri v. Biden case in 2024 will determine the scope of government censorship and impact fundamental rights.
Human Flourishing 4186 implied HN points 05 Jul 23
  1. Yesterday a major blow was landed against government censorship in court.
  2. The court granted a temporary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, limiting government officials' communication with social media companies.
  3. The ruling suggested a massive attack on free speech and described government actions as potentially unconstitutional.
Heterodox STEM 135 implied HN points 02 Jan 25
  1. Censorship in academic settings can limit the discussion of important truths. When researchers can't speak freely, society misses out on valuable insights.
  2. There are organizations and conferences focused on addressing and fighting against academic censorship. These groups aim to protect freedom of thought and promote open conversations.
  3. The Journal of Controversial Ideas allows authors to publish under pseudonyms. This encourages debate on sensitive topics while safeguarding individuals' careers and safety.
OpenTheBooks Substack 349 implied HN points 22 Nov 24
  1. A huge amount of taxpayer money, over $127 million, went to studying and fighting COVID-related misinformation. Much of this funding was aimed at promoting public health recommendations.
  2. The government has been closely working with social media companies to tag and remove content labeled as misinformation, raising concerns about free speech and trust in scientific advice.
  3. There are worries that the government’s approach to dealing with misinformation could be biased, leading to silencing dissenting voices and further eroding public faith in authorities.
Erik Torenberg's Thoughts 208 implied HN points 11 Dec 24
  1. Silicon Valley used to support free speech, but now many companies limit it to control political views. This shift is concerning as it can stifle people's voices and even their ability to earn a living.
  2. There’s a big divide in how educated professionals and working-class people think and vote. This divide shapes our institutions and can create conflict because the elite often push ideas that don’t reflect the majority's beliefs.
  3. Accountability is essential for those in power. If leaders make mistakes without facing consequences, it undermines trust. There's a call for more populist leadership that listens to the people's needs and holds elites accountable.
Who is Robert Malone 28 implied HN points 06 Feb 25
  1. USAID is a major U.S. agency that provides international assistance but is sometimes linked to the CIA in ways that raise concerns about its true role in foreign affairs.
  2. The agency has funded various programs, including controversial health campaigns and misinformation research, blurring the lines between humanitarian aid and political interests.
  3. There are allegations that USAID has been involved in population control initiatives and has funded vaccines, which raises ethical questions about their impact on global health policies.
Glenn’s Substack 2 HN points 05 Oct 24
  1. Censorship in the US is getting stronger, targeting various media and putting pressure on tech companies to limit certain viewpoints. This affects how people get information and what they can freely express online.
  2. The process of normalizing censorship often starts with small, seemingly justified actions, making it easier for the public to accept them over time. This 'slow boiling' approach gradually expands what speech is considered unacceptable.
  3. As the government and tech companies control more online speech, there's a growing call for alternative platforms that support free expression, highlighting the increasing need for forums where diverse opinions can be shared.
Freddie deBoer 4238 implied HN points 02 Feb 24
  1. In the age of the internet, censoring content is extremely challenging because of the global spread of digital infrastructure.
  2. Efforts to stop the spread of harmful content like deepfake porn may not be entirely successful due to the structure of the modern internet.
  3. Acknowledging limitations in controlling information dissemination doesn't equate to a lack of will to address concerning issues.
Alex's Personal Blog 164 implied HN points 31 Dec 24
  1. Some venture capitalists are backing a project called New Founding that seeks to create a Christian community in Kentucky. They aim to build businesses that align with their values while opposing what they see as leftist censorship.
  2. The idea of merging Christianity with business is met with skepticism, as many feel it won't lead to a more open society. The author reflects on their own experiences with conservative Christians and predicts these efforts will not promote true freedom of expression.
  3. Recent social progress, like women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights, is valued, and the author emphasizes the importance of continuing to uphold these advancements instead of reverting to past restrictive views.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 312 implied HN points 03 Dec 24
  1. Angela Merkel's memoir has received a mix of reviews, with many readers critiquing her lack of self-reflection. They feel she does not acknowledge her mistakes during her time as chancellor.
  2. Amazon has stopped accepting new reviews for the book after receiving a lot of negative feedback, showing that readers are not happy with its content.
  3. Mainstream media reviews are generally positive, focusing on Merkel's achievements, while ordinary readers have a more critical view of her legacy and writing style.
Uncharted Territories 1808 implied HN points 31 Jan 24
  1. Throughout history, controlling the flow of information has been a key focus for those in power.
  2. The evolution of media, from books to radio to TV and now social media, has changed the landscape of public opinion.
  3. Balancing free speech with the dangers of misinformation in the digital age remains a complex challenge for society.
The DisInformation Chronicle 385 implied HN points 01 Nov 24
  1. Media organizations are teaming up to push narratives that silence critics of politicians. This raises concerns about free speech in a democratic society.
  2. YouTube and other platforms are being pressured to remove content labeled as misinformation, often targeting conservative voices. This suggests a targeted effort to control the information available to the public.
  3. There is increasing scrutiny and criticism of social media platforms like Twitter for their handling of misinformation, particularly as they relate to upcoming elections. This scrutiny often coincides with efforts to diminish the reach of certain viewpoints.
Pen>Sword 2496 implied HN points 11 Dec 23
  1. Instagram is actively suppressing Palestinian voices and their allies, enforcing this censorship online.
  2. Instagram's suppression tactics include flagged accounts, disabled features, restricted reach, and suspended accounts, particularly targeting pro-Palestinian content.
  3. Instagram's strategic partnerships with Israeli government bodies like the Israeli Cyber Unit reveal a deep collaboration that supports digital suppression against voices in and for Gaza.
Glenn’s Substack 439 implied HN points 16 Jun 24
  1. Labeling someone as 'controversial' can shut down meaningful debate. It's important to have open discussions, especially about difficult topics like international conflicts.
  2. Censorship often happens under the guise of protecting moral values, but it can prevent us from understanding the full picture. People need to hear all sides of an argument to make informed decisions.
  3. Understanding the other party's perspective in conflicts is crucial for peace. Instead of dividing ourselves, we should look for ways to engage and resolve issues together.
Heterodox STEM 99 implied HN points 05 Jan 25
  1. MIT recently banned a student magazine for an article discussing the limitations of nonviolent protest, sparking a debate about free speech on campus.
  2. The situation highlights how expressing controversial or radical ideas can lead to disciplinary actions at universities.
  3. The case shows the challenges students face when trying to discuss extreme views and the balance between safety and free expression in academic settings.
Castalia 519 implied HN points 23 May 24
  1. Many traditional institutions, like PEN America and NPR, are struggling because they tried to overly cater to progressive demands but ended up alienating audiences. It's important for these organizations to return to their core missions and values.
  2. The New York Times seems to be adjusting its approach to reporting and emphasizing independence after a difficult period, while other outlets continue to face public trust issues due to perceived ideological bias.
  3. The so-called 'Intellectual Dark Web' has gained attention for their critiques of mainstream discourse, but many still view them with suspicion. This shows a need for open conversations and diverse perspectives, especially in today's polarized political climate.
bad cattitude 314 implied HN points 31 Oct 24
  1. People often struggle to accept shocking information because it feels too unbelievable. This is called cognitive dissonance, where their brain wants to reject things that don't fit their understanding.
  2. Normalcy bias can make us overlook serious problems because we think things like that don't happen. It's hard for us to see when something is way outside of what's normal.
  3. Free speech and access to truthful information are crucial for social change. When individuals start to question and learn, it can lead to a broader awakening in society.
bad cattitude 220 implied HN points 19 Nov 24
  1. People can mistake harmful groups for support, thinking they are safe when they are actually being isolated and manipulated.
  2. When a group only allows one opinion, it creates an echo chamber that cuts out other viewpoints, which is unhealthy.
  3. Those who tightly hold on to their beliefs may become more extreme and disconnected from reality, making it hard to communicate with those outside their group.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 211 implied HN points 05 Dec 24
  1. The U.S. State Department spends a lot of money to influence media coverage against its rivals. This shows how powerful and coordinated media can be.
  2. Many journalists and media outlets may not realize they are being funded or influenced by the U.S. government. This raises questions about the independence of journalism.
  3. People notice that despite having many different media outlets, they often share the same viewpoints. This suggests there might be stronger connections among them than we think.
Who is Robert Malone 12 implied HN points 11 Feb 25
  1. Parler is back online, aiming to be a safe space for free speech and open discussions about health and politics. It's a platform where people can express their views without the fear of censorship.
  2. Over the years, Parler faced challenges and was even deplatformed by major tech companies, highlighting the struggle for free expression in today's digital age. This situation raises questions about how much control big tech should have over public conversations.
  3. Now, with a renewed focus on health freedom and individual rights, Parler wants to encourage open dialogue and protect the right to speak up. It stands as a reminder of the importance of free speech in society.
Unsafe Science 45 implied HN points 15 Jan 25
  1. There are concerns about censorship in academia that need to be addressed. People should be able to share and discuss ideas freely without fear of being shut down.
  2. Some believe that the current academic system is failing and might require a complete overhaul. It's suggested that starting fresh could lead to better ideas and practices.
  3. Engaging with diverse perspectives can enhance the learning experience. Encouraging different viewpoints can help improve critical thinking and innovation.
COVID Reason 3588 implied HN points 04 Jul 23
  1. A judge issued a significant injunction against the government in Missouri v. Biden case on the 4th of July.
  2. The government is now prohibited from censoring social media content.
  3. Specific individuals and entities were named in the order, outlining the actions they are no longer allowed to take regarding social media censorship.
The Signorile Report 1218 implied HN points 08 Feb 24
  1. Some Republican politicians have been publicly burning books as part of a book ban crusade.
  2. Governor Ron DeSantis defended against criticism of book bans in Florida, claiming the comparisons to censorship were a hoax.
  3. A Republican secretary of state candidate in Missouri burned LGBTQ and sex education books, inciting hate and promoting extremist views.