Singal-Minded • 655 implied HN points • 29 Jan 26
- Ubiquitous video does not reliably make people more reality-based; even clear footage often fails to change minds. Many viewers double down on their initial beliefs instead of updating when new evidence appears.
- Emotional, social, and tribal commitments shape how people interpret video, so people rationalize or ignore contrary evidence and create competing narratives. That means footage can inflame polarization rather than settle facts.
- Persistent human cognitive biases mean more footage isn’t a cure for misinformation or flawed institutional responses. Video can help sometimes, but it won’t eliminate motivated reasoning or group-driven judgment.