The hottest Public Figures Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 561 implied HN points 18 Mar 26
  1. A major Catholic gala is featuring Candace Owens, a public figure known for spreading antisemitic claims and conspiracy theories.
  2. What looks like an innocuous religious event is giving a platform to people who peddle Jew-hating rhetoric, which risks normalizing antisemitism in faith and political spaces.
  3. Owens has promoted specific falsehoods such as minimizing Nazi medical experiments, alleging Jews or Israel were behind 9/11, and claiming a small group of political Jews control U.S. policy.
The Signorile Report 3037 implied HN points 17 Oct 24
  1. Kamala Harris handled her interview with confidence and composure, showing that she could push back against tough questions without losing her cool. This made her come across as strong and presidential.
  2. Harris was able to expose the bias in the interview and challenge misleading comments made by the host. By doing this, she highlighted Trump's deceptive rhetoric about using the military against Americans.
  3. Despite the hostile environment, Harris's performance could inspire viewers who might question Fox News narratives. Her smart and controlled responses might even encourage some to seek out the truth beyond what they hear on that network.
Noahpinion 54000 implied HN points 23 Feb 25
  1. Elon Musk is highly intelligent and has proven his capabilities through successful companies like SpaceX and Tesla. People underestimate him at their own risk.
  2. Real-world skills, like building organizations and inspiring teams, are more important than test scores for success in business. Elon excels in these areas.
  3. Criticism of Elon often stems from jealousy or misunderstanding of his talents. Just calling him 'dumb' won't change the reality of his achievements.
Aaron Mate 1131 implied HN points 08 Feb 26
  1. Noam Chomsky suffered a severe stroke and cannot speak or engage publicly, so his wife has been caring for him and has issued the explanation about their contacts with Jeffrey Epstein.
  2. They describe their interactions with Epstein as professional and social—meetings, dinners, a lunch at his ranch, visits to apartments, a $20,000 payment for a linguistic prize, and Epstein’s help resolving a financial issue—while saying they never visited his island, never saw criminal behavior or underage people, and had no investments or account access with him.
  3. They acknowledge Epstein manipulated them, admit Noam’s overly trusting nature led to poor judgment and a failure to research his background, apologize for that lapse, and express unrestricted solidarity with Epstein’s victims.
Robert Reich 35928 implied HN points 27 Jul 23
  1. Mitch McConnell froze during a news conference, highlighting the fragility of the human mind.
  2. Robert Reich shared a personal experience of freezing due to a petit mal seizure while giving a speech 35 years ago.
  3. The fear of losing control of one's mind can be a terrifying experience, emphasizing the vulnerability of all humans.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 398 implied HN points 09 Feb 26
  1. Changing your mind shows you think for yourself and takes curiosity, honesty, courage, and humility.
  2. Right now, admitting you changed your mind often becomes a 'gotcha' that pressures people to stick to their old positions.
  3. The new video series Confessions interviews people who left earlier beliefs to understand why they changed; it starts with Richard Hanania and asks others to share their stories.
Rob Henderson's Newsletter 2159 implied HN points 16 Nov 25
  1. Charlie Kirk was known for being open to debate and engaging with anyone, which helped him gain a strong following. People admired his willingness to take risks in his discussions.
  2. The interview highlighted Charlie's thoughtful and gracious nature, showcasing why he had such a significant impact on his audience.
  3. His tragic death shows the risks that come with speaking out in public. It emphasizes how important and dangerous it can be to share one's views openly.
Jeff Giesea 539 implied HN points 10 Aug 24
  1. Elon Musk often criticizes Western democracies like the UK for free speech restrictions but is quiet about countries with worse situations, such as Saudi Arabia and China.
  2. His approach to free speech seems inconsistent. While he claims to support it, some of his actions, like limiting competition on X, look hypocritical.
  3. Many feel Musk isn't doing a good job managing free expression on X. His spontaneous tweets and decisions can hurt the cause of free speech instead of helping it.
Read Max 9221 implied HN points 17 Jan 25
  1. Elon Musk has faced backlash from the gaming community after failing at a game he claimed to be good at. Gamers are calling out his dishonesty about his gaming skills.
  2. Musk's controversial comments on immigration and his partnership with nationalist groups have made some of his previous supporters uneasy. This shows a growing divide in the political groups that used to back him.
  3. Despite losing support from various communities, Musk's wealth still protects him from serious consequences. However, the criticism he receives might affect his need for approval and popularity.
The Glinner Update 2358 implied HN points 29 Jan 24
  1. Professor Jo Phoenix won her legal case against the Open University for discrimination and harassment because of her gender critical views.
  2. Ohio Senate has overridden Governor DeWine's veto, preventing medical interventions for gender-confused children.
  3. Kemi Badenoch is addressing the issue of gender pay gap data being recorded based on self-declared gender identity, rather than biological sex, in the Civil Service.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 6093 implied HN points 23 Dec 24
  1. Surrendering your freedom to make choices can lead to losing everything else that's important in life. It's essential to maintain your agency.
  2. It's easy for people to jump to conclusions about someone's actions without really knowing them. Personal experiences can provide deeper insights.
  3. Detachment from intense situations can help gain clarity and allow for more reasoned thoughts afterward. Taking time to reflect is valuable.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 1993 implied HN points 07 Jul 25
  1. Salena Zito was very close to Donald Trump when he was shot, raising her personal stakes in the situation.
  2. After the shooting, Trump called Zito to check on her and her family's well-being, showing his concern despite his own serious situation.
  3. Zito found it surprising that neither she nor her family felt shaken immediately after the incident, suggesting they may process their feelings later.
Alexander News Network -Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack 1533 implied HN points 10 Jan 24
  1. RFK Jr. and other leaders say not to blame anyone for Covid vaccine harms
  2. They emphasize moving on and avoiding retribution or blame
  3. Calls to clean up regulatory agencies, remove corporate influence, and ensure open public discourse
Logging the World 1734 implied HN points 01 Nov 23
  1. The recent inquiry involving Dominic Cummings felt like a repeat of past events, with little new information emerging.
  2. The popular narrative about Cummings' role in the COVID response may not align with the evidence, suggesting he was supportive of strict measures.
  3. The discussion around the COVID response should focus on the systemic failures and critical decisions made, rather than getting lost in political dramas and minor details.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 1335 implied HN points 11 Feb 25
  1. Elon Musk's DOGE initiative brought back a staffer who resigned after making racist posts online. This decision was based on a poll where most respondents agreed with his reinstatement.
  2. The backlash against 'woke culture' is linked to reactions against public figures losing their jobs over offensive past statements. Many incidents involved celebrities and public figures being fired for things they said or did online.
  3. As younger people in the DOGE initiative are heavily active online, more controversial past comments may emerge. This raises concerns about the kinds of people joining government positions and their influence.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 2448 implied HN points 06 Feb 24
  1. Public figures face serious threats from extremists, leading to a chilling effect on free speech.
  2. President Biden seems too busy to engage in debates, raising questions about his approach to media interaction.
  3. Investing in education should prioritize core skills like reading and math, rather than controversial ideologies.
Silver Bulletin 705 implied HN points 25 Feb 25
  1. Spiky intelligence means someone can be really smart in some areas but not so great in others. Elon Musk, for example, shines in tech and entrepreneurship but may lack emotional intelligence.
  2. Highly intelligent people, like Musk, often have strong ideas but can make poor decisions due to overconfidence or lack of well-rounded skills. It's crucial to evaluate their actions without either extreme praise or blame.
  3. In industries like tech, people with spiky intelligence often succeed because they excel in specific skills, but may also come across as difficult or lacking in social awareness.
Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality 361 implied HN points 14 Jun 25
  1. Elon Musk initially found success by overpromising but often delivered exceptional results with his companies, like Tesla and SpaceX. However, this ability may have been overshadowed by his association with Donald Trump.
  2. Musk's close relationship with Trump, while beneficial in certain cultural aspects, poses significant risks to his businesses and financial interests. Trump's policies could threaten the viability of Musk's ventures.
  3. Musk underestimated the power dynamics at play and did not secure enough protections for his interests. His strategy to deal with Trump seems ineffective, leading to a retreat from previous positions.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 268 implied HN points 27 Jul 25
  1. The Macrons are suing Candace Owens for defamation over some wild claims she made about them. This includes saying Brigitte Macron is a man and that they are related.
  2. In the US, public figures like the Macrons must show 'actual malice' to win a defamation case, which is really tough to prove. This makes their lawsuit difficult.
  3. Even with the outrageous statements made by Owens, the legal rules mean the Macrons have a challenging road ahead in court.
Men Yell at Me 346 implied HN points 20 Jun 25
  1. People are often too quick to make jokes about serious situations, and this can be harmful. It's important to recognize when humor crosses a line.
  2. Men tend to avoid dealing with their feelings, sometimes resulting in violence instead. Therapy should be a better option for addressing emotions.
  3. Social media can amplify ignorance and cruelty, as seen in comments from public figures. It's crucial to think carefully before posting or responding online.
A Lawyer Writes 550 implied HN points 13 Jul 23
  1. The story of Huw Edwards is sad and shocking, but not tragic.
  2. There was confusion in the media about Huw Edwards' situation and identity.
  3. Privacy laws and ethical standards in journalism play a crucial role in balancing freedom of expression with individual rights.
Singal-Minded 1950 implied HN points 22 Feb 24
  1. Bret Weinstein has been promoting conspiracy theories and fringe beliefs, misleading his audience and spreading misinformation.
  2. Weinstein irresponsibly suggested a link between Kary Mullis's death, Anthony Fauci criticism, and Covid policies, without evidence.
  3. Weinstein tends to make inflammatory insinuations and vague claims, aiming to appeal to conspiracy-minded individuals and fuel their fears.
Men Yell at Me 660 implied HN points 03 Jan 25
  1. JD Vance has been declared the Dingus of the Year for 2024 due to his controversial actions and opinions.
  2. The 'undecided voter' was also highlighted as a Dingus, often seen as indifferent to pressing social issues.
  3. Despite the negativity, there were some positive developments in 2024, including a significant fundraising effort for abortion access and the legalization of same-sex marriage in Thailand.
Slack Tide by Matt Labash 266 implied HN points 06 Jun 25
  1. There's a public feud happening between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and it seems to be getting pretty heated. People are reacting to this drama with a mix of humor and surprise.
  2. Some folks find it amusing to watch two influential figures clash, even if neither is particularly liked. It's a bit like rooting for the lesser of two evils in a rivalry.
  3. The ongoing conflict might distract these leaders from causing further harm through their political actions. In a way, some are hoping that their fighting leads to less damage in the bigger picture.
Men Yell at Me 738 implied HN points 23 Oct 24
  1. Melania Trump's autobiography seems to focus on her life as a victim of the media and not her husband's actions. She avoids discussing serious issues connected to his presidency.
  2. Her book portrays a life of privilege while ignoring the realities that come with it. Melania seems content to stay in her 'gilded cage,' benefiting from her situation.
  3. The idea that Melania and other white women voters are just victims of their circumstances is too simplistic. Many choose to support Trump because it aligns with their own interests.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 445 implied HN points 26 Jan 25
  1. Mount McKinley is a significant landmark in Alaska and is part of the state's identity. Many locals see it as a stunning part of their outdoor lifestyle.
  2. Sarah Palin, a well-known Alaskan figure, expresses her admiration for the mountain, saying that it's awe-inspiring when viewed on clear days.
  3. The discussion around renaming Mount McKinley suggests a deeper conversation about local identity and the importance of recognizing indigenous names.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 431 implied HN points 20 Jan 25
  1. The Free Press hosted an exciting inauguration party in Washington, D.C., attracting many influential guests. It was a lively event blending different people from politics, media, and entertainment.
  2. Guests included notable figures like Ted Cruz, Jillian Michaels, and several prominent media personalities. The gathering showcased a mix of ideas and perspectives from various parts of society.
  3. The event highlighted the themes of change and uncertainty that come with new leadership. It also marked the start of The Free Press's journey in covering news with independence and fearlessness.
Michael Tracey 161 implied HN points 18 Jul 25
  1. Steve Bannon has over 15 hours of interviews with Jeffrey Epstein that he hasn’t released. This footage could reveal important information about Epstein's life and activities.
  2. Bannon has been silent about why he won't share this footage, even though he often talks to journalists. People are curious about what he's hiding.
  3. The interviews included discussions about Epstein's relationships with powerful figures, including Donald Trump, which makes the content even more relevant and intriguing.
The Ruffian 460 implied HN points 16 Nov 24
  1. Charisma and charm are different. Charisma makes someone seem larger than life, while charm makes them relatable and friendly.
  2. Political figures can succeed with either style, but they should stick to what suits them best. Trying too hard to switch styles can backfire.
  3. It's helpful to know if you are more charismatic or charming, as this can guide your interactions and relationships both personally and professionally.
Thinking about... 437 implied HN points 12 Nov 24
  1. Oligarchs are like a group of powerful people isolated on an island, focusing more on their own interests than the needs of everyday people.
  2. Using humor, like the concept of 'Oligarchs' Island' as a sitcom, can help us understand the ridiculousness and danger of such power dynamics.
  3. Oligarchies are unstable and can quickly change, suggesting that we should be aware of their flaws and the potential for conflict among them.
Proof 268 implied HN points 29 Jan 25
  1. Two essays about Elon Musk reveal surprising details about his rise and influence. They suggest he has traits of a supervillain.
  2. These writings claim to outline significant moments in Musk's life that shaped his current persona. It's a perspective that paints him as a global threat.
  3. The essays have gone viral, attracting attention and debate about Musk's character and motivations. It's a compelling read for anyone curious about his impact.
Unreported Truths 70 implied HN points 06 Jun 25
  1. Elon Musk and Donald Trump have very different personalities and styles. Musk is focused on big, visionary goals, while Trump is more about managing perceptions and negotiating.
  2. Musk's recent comments about Trump crossing a line with Epstein claims seem impulsive and may not be backed by solid evidence. This could damage Musk's reputation instead of helping him.
  3. There are concerns about Musk's drug use, especially ketamine, which could be affecting his behavior negatively. People worry he might need help managing his stress and responsibilities.
Weaponized 52 implied HN points 25 Jun 25
  1. Elon Musk is allowing his followers to suggest 'politically incorrect' facts to rework history. This includes some dangerously false claims about sensitive topics like the Holocaust.
  2. Many responses include outright Holocaust denial, where people try to minimize the number of Jewish people killed. This shows how misinformation can spread easily online.
  3. Musk has been linked to antisemitic behavior before, and his recent actions might give a platform to harmful ideas that try to erase historical truths about events like the Holocaust.
Proof 115 implied HN points 12 Jan 25
  1. Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg are involved in a struggle that goes beyond their public personas. It indicates deeper issues and contrasting views on capitalism.
  2. Musk's long-held image of being a principled capitalist is being challenged. His true views may not align with what he has portrayed for years.
  3. Zuckerberg may be following a similar path, suggesting that both figures are redefining their roles and the narratives around them in the business world.
A B’Old Woman 199 implied HN points 15 Dec 22
  1. Using the word 'prick' is traditionally aimed at men, and it raises questions about assumptions made about gender. The author humorously suggests that if someone might not present as male, should we be cautious about our language?
  2. The idea of needing to inspect someone's genitals to determine their gender is highlighted as absurd. Many believe we can recognize gender based on social cues and experiences.
  3. There’s a conflict in how society views gender and language, especially when it comes to terms that might seem offensive or outdated. The piece stresses that understanding gender requires more than just looking at physical traits.
Phillips’s Newsletter 90 implied HN points 07 Jan 25
  1. Public figures often try to control how they are remembered after their time in power. They do this through flattering books and hiring people to write nice histories about them.
  2. When in power, these leaders can shape their image but that doesn't last forever. After they are gone, their history will be analyzed and critiqued in ways that could upset them.
  3. The Biden Administration, despite being praised, faced several foreign policy missteps. Their attempts to create a positive narrative about these failures may not be successful in the long run.
Gotham by Susan Dyer Reynolds 58 implied HN points 17 May 23
  1. A Twitter meme led to a lawsuit against a harm reduction advocate, sparking controversy and legal battles.
  2. The lawsuit against the meme-maker, 'Doe 1,' resulted in attempts to uncover their identity, drawing attention to the meme.
  3. The anonymous meme maker used satire to criticize harm reduction efforts, leading to a legal battle over free speech rights.
Unpopular Front 31 implied HN points 27 Oct 24
  1. The debate about fascism has moved from academics to politics, with notable figures openly calling Trump a fascist. This shows that such discussions are becoming more mainstream.
  2. Several high-ranking officials, including generals and former Trump staff, are expressing serious concerns about Trump's actions and their implications for democracy.
  3. Historian Robert Paxton is being highlighted for his views on Trump and fascism, indicating that experts are increasingly weighing in on these topics.