Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 547 implied HN points • 07 Dec 25
- Deliberately testing hardware to destruction is a normal, necessary way to find weaknesses and build stronger weapons, and it’s better to fail on the range than on the battlefield.
- Calling routine destructive tests mere 'failures' misframes and can unfairly damage companies doing risky but essential national-defense work.
- There was a time when the press accepted and even supported testing-to-failure because it sped weapon development, and recent negative coverage represents a shift from that practical mindset.