The hottest U.S. Politics Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

SHOW NOTES: Bullies, Authoritarians, and French Fries

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 1278 implied HN points • 22 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Campaigns Polling Political Commentary Party Dynamics
  1. Kamala Harris is struggling to connect with voters, especially Black voters in Georgia, who feel she lacks relatable experience. Many are undecided and may not vote at all.
  2. There's a growing sense among Democrats that they might lose the election, with signs of weakening support for Harris. Their current tactics seem to rely more on shaming than persuasion.
  3. Voter turnout patterns indicate that less engaged voters might be supporting Trump, which poses a challenge for pollsters trying to predict the election outcome.

Ivanka Hands the Microphone to Jared

Vicky Ward Investigates • 179 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Media Coverage Influence Election Dynamics Public Relations
  1. Ivanka might be stepping back while Jared takes the spotlight. This could mean a shift in their roles or focus.
  2. There seems to be a dynamic between Ivanka and Jared that’s worth noticing. It might show how they influence each other.
  3. People are curious about what this change means for their future plans. It raises questions about their priorities and ambitions.

Trump Announces A Sort Of Cease Fire, and, The US Strategic Goal Seems To Be "Mowing The Grass"

Phillips’s Newsletter • 186 implied HN points • 23 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy National Security Military Strategy Diplomacy Middle East Presidency
  1. The US lacks a clear, consistent strategic goal and seems to be practicing “mowing the grass.” That means repeated, limited strikes without a path to decisive victory, making the campaign costly and purposeless.
  2. A short cease-fire announcement looks like a tactical backtrack to avoid extreme actions and calm markets, but it probably only pauses operations rather than ends the conflict.
  3. This approach effectively guarantees the Iranian regime survives and can rebuild smarter, so regime change is off the table and strategic gains are doubtful.

Fascism lives in the house capitalism built

Quid Amo • 857 implied HN points • 24 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political theory Historical Analysis
  1. Fascism is not a fixed idea; it changes over time. Understanding it requires looking at its history and how it adapts to new contexts.
  2. Fascism thrives in moments of crisis and often uses nostalgia to rally support. This means it can appeal to people's feelings about the past to gain power.
  3. Fascism isn't just something separate from capitalism; it's closely linked to it. It can be seen as a reaction to the flaws within capitalist societies, showing that both ideas can coexist.

The underside narrative surfaces

gender:hacked by Eliza Mondegreen • 2956 implied HN points • 16 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Trans rights Legal issues Mental health Social justice Disability Rights
  1. Gavin Grimm faced a lot of bullying and rejection after coming out as transgender, which made life very difficult for him. His transition didn't solve all his problems and instead brought new challenges that he had to deal with.
  2. Grimm's story highlights the serious mental health issues that can arise, like PTSD, after being bullied and misunderstood. Even with support from friends and some family, the pain of being rejected really affected his well-being.
  3. There are questions about how well the medical community takes into account the unique struggles of transgender people, especially in cases like Grimm's. Just transitioning doesn't guarantee a happy future, and many still face tough realities.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Why Attack Iran?

Thinking about... • 1752 implied HN points • 28 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy National Security Elections Authoritarianism Corruption Executive Power Democracy
  1. A war with Iran can be used to weaken democracy at home by rallying the public, branding opponents as traitors, and shaping election conditions to favor those in power.
  2. The conflict may also serve personal enrichment, since Gulf allies who oppose Iran have financially rewarded the president and his family, creating a motive for using U.S. force to help those backers.
  3. There are non‑military ways to address Iranian repression—like targeted pressure, support for opposition, and help with water and ecological crises—but those options aren’t being offered, so citizens must demand scrutiny and ask hard questions during wartime.

Resistance is necessary, but it's not enough

Noahpinion • 26353 implied HN points • 20 Jan 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Governance Civil Liberties Immigration Public Opinion Authoritarianism
  1. Opposing authoritarian actions is essential, but resistance alone won't win long-term political change.
  2. Public backlash is growing against aggressive immigration enforcement and other heavy‑handed tactics, yet the broader movement supporting those tactics hasn't fully collapsed.
  3. Liberals need a clear, principled movement and a concrete plan for governing to turn public outrage into durable electoral victories.

Will a Nazi Tattoo Cost Democrats the Senate?

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 556 implied HN points • 16 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Candidates Campaigns Scandals Partisanship Media
  1. Many Democrats and progressives are backing Graham Platner because they think he can win, even though he has been linked to a Nazi tattoo.
  2. Supporters are downplaying or ignoring his faux working-class background and his brushes with bigots to focus on flipping a Senate seat.
  3. Prioritizing electability over character concerns could hurt Democratic credibility and might backfire politically down the road.

The Greatest Tension Within 21st Century Progressivism Remains Unresolved

Freddie deBoer • 12066 implied HN points • 10 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Criminal Justice Policing Gender Politics Racial Justice Legal system Public Policy Social movements
  1. Many progressives oppose police power and mass incarceration in general, but also demand tougher prosecutions and punishments in high-profile sexual violence and discrimination cases.
  2. Pushing for harsher criminal responses in those specific cases tends to expand prosecutorial and sentencing power and predictably increases racial disparities and overpunishment for marginalized people.
  3. The left rarely confronts this contradiction openly, and must choose whether to build non-carceral supports and protect due process or to accept expanding the carceral state with its attendant harms.

The US War Machine Is Run By Deranged Armageddon Cultists

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2649 implied HN points • 05 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Defense Policy National Security Military Religion Political Rhetoric
  1. Senior US officials are using aggressive, macho war rhetoric and promising relentless strikes on Iran, openly celebrating overwhelming military force.
  2. Evangelical religious influence has seeped into the military and government, with leaders framing the conflict as divinely sanctioned and even apocalyptic.
  3. The US imperial system is portrayed as dangerously hypocritical and tyrannical, led by zealots who shouldn't be trusted with nuclear power, and the piece argues this system must be dismantled for humanity's sake.

Want To See What a Blue State Looks Like

Points And Figures • 612 implied HN points • 18 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Campaigns State Politics Voting Partisanship Public Policy
  1. Illinois is used as an example of a deeply blue state where Democrats dominate elections, leading to left-leaning officials, higher taxes, and people moving away.
  2. To avoid a similar outcome, Republicans and conservatives are urged to fund and back viable candidates in purple states like Nevada and, above all, turn out to vote.
  3. A candidate stresses decades of financial experience and is seeking donations and national backing to win the Nevada state treasurer race and counter heavy Democratic spending.

Losing the War on Truth

Thinking about... • 1217 implied HN points • 02 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Elections National Security Governance Media Institutions
  1. A leader’s habitual lying and pursuit of personal pleasure can drive reckless decisions like war, and those lies erode the factual basis needed for good governance.
  2. The war against Iran has been justified with contradictory excuses—nuclear threat, regime change, and electoral interference—that don’t hold up and have produced real harm: mass deaths, weakened alliances, diverted military resources, and greater risks of proliferation and terrorism.
  3. Protecting simple truths and rebuilding institutions is essential to stop authoritarian deception; defending election integrity, restoring oversight, and exposing contradictions can help build coalitions to prevent power grabs.

Judicial Notice (10.27.24): Money Talks

Original Jurisdiction • 319 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Elections Legal Government Legislation
  1. Susman Godfrey won a huge $1.6 billion verdict for a client, which means they could earn a massive fee. This proves their strength in handling big cases.
  2. Kobre & Kim also had a big win, securing a $605 million jury verdict in a trade secrets case. This shows that some law firms are doing really well right now.
  3. There are talks about potential attorney general candidates for a future Trump administration, indicating shifts in political and legal roles ahead.

The Saturday Read: Mere political games

The Saturday Read • 499 implied HN points • 26 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political parties Political strategy Campaigns Policy
  1. Labour's ties to American politics can be problematic, like when they were accused of interfering in the US elections. This shows how political games often cross borders and create complications.
  2. Alexei Navalny's memoir reveals his dark humor and predictions about his fate under the Kremlin. It's a powerful reminder of the risks dissidents face for speaking out.
  3. Kamala Harris's campaign struggled because she had little time to connect with voters and build support. This suggests that sometimes, issues go deeper than the candidate's abilities.

The Press Covers for Harris Again

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2557 implied HN points • 15 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Media bias Political Coverage Election Analysis Public Opinion Political Commentary
  1. The media often protects certain politicians, like Kamala Harris, and downplays their mistakes. This makes many people distrust the press.
  2. There are significant discrepancies in how the media covers stories about politicians from different parties. Some issues are treated as major scandals for Republicans but barely mentioned for Democrats.
  3. Many reporters seem to have a bias towards the left and don't show much interest in understanding or presenting views outside their own beliefs.

Nasty, Brutish, and Long.

Breaking the News • 2103 implied HN points • 26 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Presidency Congress Political parties Public Opinion Political media Civil-Military Foreign Policy
  1. The speech will probably be old news quickly but still matters as a sign that the Republican Party is deeply servile to the president and as a moment future historians will point to.
  2. It combined awkward, poorly delivered scripted passages with long, recycled rally riffs — the prepared parts sounded wooden and the rest was narcissistic blame-gaming that drew rapturous GOP applause.
  3. The act is losing its novelty and energy; what used to be unpredictable and compelling now felt boring and low‑energy, weakening its ability to hold or grow a broad audience.

ONE WEEK! Here's Your Guide to Election Night

COVID Reason • 178 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Voting Political strategy Demographics
  1. It's important to look closely at county-level data for the election. This helps predict where candidates might do well or struggle.
  2. For Republicans to win, they need to do better in rural areas and keep suburban voters from turning away. They also need to attract more Hispanic voters compared to previous elections.
  3. A detailed spreadsheet is available that tracks key indicators for the election. This will help gauge how each area is leaning as the results come in.

SHOW NOTES: They, Them, and You; Feminine Pee Squatters; Leaks; and Fries

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 1179 implied HN points • 21 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Campaigns Polls Political parties National Security
  1. Trump's campaign messages resonate with voters, particularly on cultural issues, while Democrats struggle to connect with certain demographics like men and minorities.
  2. The recent leaks of classified information from the Biden-Harris administration raise serious concerns about national security and the integrity of intelligence operations.
  3. Kamala Harris's campaign appears ineffective as she distances herself from traditional voter outreach and relies on celebrity endorsements rather than genuine connection with the public.

Pentagon Should Focus on Defense Priorities, not Lavish Dinners, After Historic $93.4B “Use-It-or-Lose-It” September

OpenTheBooks Substack • 1111 implied HN points • 09 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Defense Procurement Oversight Fiscal policy Government spending National Security
  1. The Pentagon ran a historic end-of-year spending rush — about $93.4 billion in September 2025, with a huge surge in the last days of the fiscal year.
  2. A large share of that money went to nonessential purchases like luxury food, high-end furniture, musical instruments, and rushed IT buys, and included billions spent on foreign-made goods.
  3. Lawmakers should change the one-year spending deadline or allow rollovers so defense leaders can prioritize critical warfighting needs instead of last-minute splurges.

If You Want Different Outcomes, You Have to Do Different Things

Freddie deBoer • 19090 implied HN points • 25 Jan 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Social movements Political strategy Protests Policy Organizing Race relations
  1. Anger and protest are justified but not enough; you have to pair righteous rage with clear thinking, ruthless self-criticism, and realistic strategy.
  2. Durable change depends on concrete policy demands and sustained political organizing, not just symbolic goals like abolishing an agency without fixing the wider system.
  3. Tactics matter: calls for violence or naive actions like a general strike can backfire, so prioritize disciplined plans that focus on measurable outcomes.

BREAKING: Crime Actually Did Go Up in 2022

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2218 implied HN points • 16 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Crime Rates Media bias Government oversight Public Policy
  1. Crime went up in 2022, contrary to some reports. This means that the fears about rising crime were not unfounded.
  2. The FBI quietly changed its crime statistics without much public notice. This raises questions about how transparent they are with the data.
  3. Corrections to important data usually receive less attention than the original shocking stories. This could mislead people about the true situation.

The Truth About FEMA and Helene

Tom Renz’s Newsletter • 5753 implied HN points • 05 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Disaster Response Federal Agencies Government Policy Public Safety Emergency Management
  1. FEMA's response to disasters has faced serious criticism, especially in recent events. Many feel that the organization is not doing enough to help those in need.
  2. The situation in the North Carolina area after the hurricane is extremely bad, with reports suggesting a very high death toll. It highlights the urgency and severity of the crisis.
  3. It's important to support those affected by disasters through prayer and community efforts, as many feel let down by government responses. There's a call for individual action in times of need.

SIGN THIS PETITION TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN TO END VACCINE MANDATES, RESTORE OUR RIGHTS TO SUE FOR VACCINE INJURIES, PROTECT EXEMPTIONS AND REMOVE LIABILITY PROTECTIONS

Popular Rationalism • 1169 implied HN points • 21 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Strategy Public Health Political Campaigns Vaccine Policy
  1. There is a push to end vaccine mandates and allow people to choose whether to get vaccinated without penalties. This means making sure people don't have to worry about losing their jobs or education over their vaccine choices.
  2. The group wants to restore the right for people to sue vaccine manufacturers if they get hurt by a vaccine. This is important for holding companies accountable.
  3. They are also asking for more freedom to refuse vaccines by protecting exemptions in every state. This would let more people avoid getting vaccinated for personal or religious reasons.

Delta Is Ready When You Are, Democrats

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2697 implied HN points • 14 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Candidates Campaigns Polls Voter Engagement
  1. Many Democrats are starting to feel nervous about the upcoming election. They think Trump might have a better chance of winning than before.
  2. There are worries that the Democrats are not connecting well with Black and Latino voters, especially younger men. This could be a big problem in the election.
  3. Some Democrats believe their campaign strategies have not been effective. They think they may have waited too long to focus on important issues that matter to voters.

Trump's vibes-driven victory narrative crashes and burns

The Signorile Report • 2398 implied HN points • 15 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Campaigns Polling Media Political Analysis
  1. Recent polls show that Trump is not leading as he claimed, with Harris actually holding a slight lead in important voter groups. This means his narrative of an easy victory is not supported by the data.
  2. Trump's recent public appearances and behavior have raised concerns about his fitness for office. Harris is effectively highlighting these issues, contrasting her own active campaigning with Trump's evasiveness.
  3. Harris is showing strong leadership by engaging with multiple media outlets and audiences. This approach seems to resonate more with voters, while Trump's awkward town hall meetings are backfiring.

Freedom. It's Meaningful

Points And Figures • 586 implied HN points • 18 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Campaigns Immigration Economic Policy Political Ideology Civic engagement
  1. The United States acts as a huge opportunity zone where newcomers can rebuild their lives and pursue the American Dream.
  2. Freedom is deeply meaningful for people who fled oppressive systems, and gaining it can be emotional and life-changing.
  3. A campaign for Nevada State Treasurer is seeking participation and donations to support the run.

Today's Hot Reads: Fear, Strategy, and Surprising Political Twists

COVID Reason • 218 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Voter sentiment Campaign strategies Political Influence
  1. Using fear in political campaigns may not actually help win voters, and it could just create noise.
  2. Young voters are becoming more important in elections, and there's a focus on how Harris is trying to engage them.
  3. Trump's popularity may be rising in response to attacks from the left, showing a surprising twist in voter support.

War Propaganda and Iran: The Exact Script Used for Every Failed US War Is Hauled Out Again

Glenn Greenwald • 4749 implied HN points • 23 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Military Intervention Media Manipulation Regime Change Public Opinion Historical Analysis
  1. Governments and media keep recycling the same discredited propaganda to sell new wars, claiming humanitarian motives while hiding strategic or political aims.
  2. Friendly exiles and lurid atrocity stories are staged and amplified to portray targets as uniquely evil and eager for liberation, even when those claims are unreliable or false.
  3. Critics of proposed wars are routinely smeared as enemy sympathizers, which suppresses dissent, ignores public opinion, and allows destructive conflicts to proceed with little accountability.

Terror on the Upper East Side

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1451 implied HN points • 09 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Local Politics Public Safety Terrorism Media Coverage Law enforcement Extremism
  1. Two men inspired by ISIS tried to detonate homemade bombs on Manhattan’s Upper East Side and were arrested, with witnesses reporting chants like "Allahu akbar."
  2. The mayor’s statement and much mainstream coverage framed the incident as linked to white supremacists, which downplayed or mischaracterized the attackers’ reported Islamist inspiration.
  3. The gap between on-scene evidence and official/media narratives suggests politicized or inaccurate reporting that could mislead the public.

Make America Gilded Again

Campaign Trails • 5064 implied HN points • 04 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political History Campaign strategies Economic Policy Social movements Populism
  1. Many people support Trump's idea of making America great again, but it's mostly based on nostalgic feelings about the past. They often don't really specify what that 'great' time is.
  2. Trump's idea seems to relate to the 1890s, a time known for wealth for a few and poverty for many. Most people were struggling to get by while a small number of rich people thrived.
  3. The 1890s also had serious issues with racism and restrictions on people's rights. For many, that period was quite harsh, showing that Trump's vision might not be good for everyone.

Monopoly Round-Up: Why Did Trump Just Attack the Fed and Corporate America?

BIG by Matt Stoller • 24981 implied HN points • 12 Jan 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Economy Antitrust Housing Regulation Corporate Power
  1. The administration has pivoted from "Make America Wealthy Again" to an affordability message, attacking big landlords, credit card companies, and defense contractors as a way to respond to public anger about high prices.
  2. There is a big gap between rhetoric and reality: enforcement decisions and personnel moves have often helped consolidation and weakened consumer protections, so the tough talk may not become real policy.
  3. The White House is even using aggressive moves against institutions like the Fed to try to lower costs, but those tactics risk backfiring and make the affordability agenda look conflicted and unpredictable.

Anthropic and the DoW: Anthropic Responds

Don't Worry About the Vase • 3942 implied HN points • 27 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Security Defense Policy Technology Policy Civil Liberties Congress Oversight
  1. Anthropic refused the Pentagon's demand to allow "any lawful use" because it will not enable mass domestic surveillance or deployment of fully autonomous lethal weapons, and it insists on keeping those guardrails while still offering to support national security work.
  2. The Department of War's threats to label Anthropic a supply-chain risk or invoke the Defense Production Act were widely criticized as contradictory and heavy-handed, and many experts, lawmakers, and tech employees warned this coercion could chill future government–industry cooperation.
  3. Swapping out Anthropic would take months and create operational risk, since frontier LLMs aren’t reliable for lethal automation; the preferred fixes are continued negotiation, narrow targeted measures, or an orderly wind-down rather than escalatory legal action.

Secretary of War Tweets That Anthropic is Now a Supply Chain Risk

Don't Worry About the Vase • 3136 implied HN points • 02 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Security Defense Policy Technology Policy AI Governance Surveillance Government Contracts Civil Liberties
  1. A Defense official tried to brand Anthropic a supply-chain risk and ban partners from working with it, a move that looks legally questionable and could seriously damage the company, markets, and national-security supply chains.
  2. The real fight was over mass domestic surveillance and use of AI with big commercial datasets and autonomous weapons — Anthropic insisted on contractual red lines, while the Pentagon pushed for “all lawful use.”
  3. OpenAI cut a fast deal that leans on a technical “safety stack” and trust in the military’s legal view rather than strong contract limits, which might calm things short-term but leaves weak legal protections and a risky precedent that employees and the public should scrutinize.

The Secret Police Playbook

Can We Still Govern? • 566 implied HN points • 13 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Law enforcement Civil Service Authoritarianism Civil Liberties Homeland security
  1. Secret police are often staffed not by ideological monsters but by ordinary officers stuck in their careers who take a ‘detour’ into repressive units because it offers advancement, pay, and security.
  2. Authoritarian leaders assemble this system by creating a second, fast-growing pyramid — funding it, lowering vetting and training standards, hollowing out traditional institutions, and loudly signaling impunity so people feel safe breaking rules.
  3. A strict meritocracy can make the problem worse by producing a large pool of career-pressured losers who are easy to recruit into repression, and the same pressures that build a coercive force can also create coup risks, so spotting and interrupting the process matters.

Questions for Markwayne Mullin

The Watch • 924 implied HN points • 13 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Homeland security Elections Executive Branch Oversight Law enforcement Civil Rights Corruption
  1. Markwayne Mullin appears unqualified to run DHS because he lacks law enforcement, military, intelligence, or emergency-response experience and has a record of alarming behavior.
  2. There are serious worries he would follow politically driven or unlawful orders from the president—like interfering with elections, seizing equipment, withholding funds, or defying courts—rather than defend the rule of law.
  3. DHS under the current administration is accused of promoting extremist-linked messaging, lying about deadly use-of-force incidents, and avoiding accountability, so any nominee must commit to independent investigations and clear steps to restore public trust.

Vibecession: Much More Than You Wanted To Know

Astral Codex Ten • 54854 implied HN points • 04 Dec 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Economic Policy Consumer sentiment Youth Issues Social contract Housing Market
  1. The term 'vibecession' describes a time when the economy seemed fine but people's feelings about it were negative. Many young people feel stuck, afraid they can't achieve stability or homeownership like earlier generations.
  2. Despite economists saying things are getting better, many young people still don't feel it. They are often burdened by high housing costs and see less opportunity compared to boomers, even if their incomes have increased.
  3. A big issue is that opportunities now require more effort to achieve, which can make young people feel like they are failing even if they are doing okay. Media coverage also tends to focus more on negative narratives, contributing to this feeling.

Was MAGA ever really "anti-war"?

Michael Tracey • 56 implied HN points • 24 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Partisanship Political Movements Military Policy Elections Leadership Media
  1. People's attitudes toward war mostly track their partisan loyalties rather than a steady anti-war or pro-war philosophy, so support shifts when leaders or party cues change.
  2. Despite anti-war rhetoric, Trump and key MAGA figures pursued aggressive military policies — big budgets, lethal strikes, and expanded deployments — that contradict claims of being "anti-war."
  3. Prominent supposed anti-war allies who joined the movement helped legitimize those contradictions, feeding false promises of ending endless war while normalizing intervention and bypassing public debate.

A Tale of Three Contracts

Don't Worry About the Vase • 2643 implied HN points • 03 Mar 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Defense National Security AI Policy Government Contracts Surveillance Regulation
  1. Anthropic’s original DoD deal deployed Claude Gov on classified networks with a layered safety stack, forward‑deployed engineers, and explicit red lines like no domestic mass surveillance and no autonomous weapons without a human in the kill chain, and it reportedly worked well for national security.
  2. The Department pushed to rewrite the contract to allow “all lawful use,” Anthropic refused because that would erode its red lines, negotiations collapsed amid threats to punish Anthropic, and OpenAI then rushed a separate deal that included similar language while relying on its own safety stack and planned amendments.
  3. The exact contract language is legally ambiguous — terms like “surveillance,” “as appropriate,” and “all lawful use” can be interpreted in many ways — so experts are skeptical the changes will reliably prevent misuse; ultimately this shows trust, clear definitions, and enforceable oversight are what matter most to avoid damaging national security or private companies.

Gone Fishin’: How The FBI Can Spend Years Trying To Hook You

TK News by Matt Taibbi • 3072 implied HN points • 27 Feb 26
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law enforcement Federal Agencies Civil Liberties Surveillance Privacy Intelligence Government oversight
  1. The FBI can open informal "assessments" and collect information without a warrant or even suspecting a crime.
  2. These assessments can last for years as agents "fish" for wrongdoing, but they frequently turn up nothing and are quietly closed.
  3. The information gathered can be shared with other agencies and can become a lasting federal record about individuals.