Bet On It • 75 implied HN points • 13 Feb 26
- The non-aggression axiom says no one may initiate physical force or threats against another person or their property, and that same standard should apply to governments, so actions like war, conscription, or taxation are morally suspect if done by the state.
- Property rights follow from self-ownership and rules of initial acquisition (Locke-style mixing), which ground the right to transfer or trade what you own and thus justify voluntary exchange.
- Basing rights on vague appeals to "natural" law is philosophically weak and calling rights "absolute" is misleading, yet treating property rights as flexible building blocks helps explain many social rules (for example, false alarms or trespass can be framed as property violations).